CVE-2026-47243

HIGHCVSS · not yet scored
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Kata guest escape: runtime-rs guest-root to host-root escape via virtiofs

Summary

In the runtime-rs standalone virtio-fs path, verified here with QEMU (and verified with Cloud Hypervisor too), Kata Containers runs host virtiofsd as root with:

--sandbox none --seccomp none

If an attacker has root-equivalent execution inside the Kata guest VM, they can send raw FUSE requests directly to the host virtiofsd. With the tested runtime-rs virtio-fs configuration, a raw FUSE_SYMLINK request whose new symlink name is an absolute host path is honored outside the virtio-fs shared directory.

This lets guest root create host-root owned symlinks in sensitive host paths. The PoC created here will create symlinks in the host /etc/cron.d directory, causing host cron to execute a guest-controlled payload as host root.

Impact: guest root can execute code as host root.

Affected configuration

The verified host used:

/opt/kata/share/defaults/kata-containers/runtime-rs/configuration-qemu-runtime-rs.toml

rootless = false shared_fs = "virtio-fs" virtio_fs_daemon = "/opt/kata/libexec/virtiofsd" hypervisor_name = "qemu" debug_console_enabled = false

Pinned upstream references, using Kata Containers main commit 2ffd1538a296cff93a357bfba0dfca747480a1f8:

Details

The guest kernel normally owns the virtio-fs client. A normal guest process will use filesystem syscalls, and the guest kernel will validate the paths, and only then does the kernel send FUSE messages to the host backend.

An attacker with root-equivalent access inside the guest can bypass that guest virtio-fs client. They can access the virtio-fs PCI device, mmap the virtio PCI BAR, recover guest physical addresses from /proc/self/pagemap, and build their own virtqueue from userspace. That queue can submit attacker-built FUSE messages directly to host virtiofsd.

The relevant primitive is FUSE_SYMLINK. An attacker can send a request whose body contains:

new symlink name: /etc/cron.d/kata-go-escape-cron-
symlink target: /proc//root/run/kata-containers/shared/sandboxes//ro/passthrough//rootfs/tmp/kata-go-escape-payload

The new symlink name is an absolute host path. virtiofsd should reject that request or force it to resolve below the configured --shared-dir. In the tested runtime-rs path, host-root unsandboxed virtiofsd accepts the absolute name, creating a real host symlink under /etc/cron.d.

The attacker can make the symlink target resolve through /proc//root/... for a live Kata runtime process whose mount namespace can see the guest-created payload. One matching runtime PID is enough.

When the host cron reads /etc/cron.d, it follows the root-owned symlink, loads the guest-created crontab payload, and executes it as host root.

PoC

sudo timeout --foreground --kill-after=10s 600s ctr run --rm \
  --runtime /opt/kata/runtime-rs/bin/containerd-shim-kata-v2 \
  --runtime-config-path /opt/kata/share/defaults/kata-containers/runtime-rs/configuration-qemu-runtime-rs.toml \
  --privileged \
  --privileged-without-host-devices \
  docker.io/library/kata-go-escape:local \
  "$run_id"

The container is privileged only to model the post-escape condition where the attacker already has guest-root capabilities. It is not the vulnerability by itself.

Inside the guest, the PoC:

  • Writes a cron payload to guest /tmp/kata-go-escape-payload.
  • Finds the virtio-fs PCI device in guest /sys.
  • Takes over a virtio-fs queue from userspace.
  • Sends FUSE_INIT.
  • Discovers the current runtime-rs sandbox under passthrough/.
  • Looks up passthrough//rootfs/tmp/kata-go-escape-payload.
  • Sends raw FUSE_SYMLINK requests where the new symlink names are absolute host paths under /etc/cron.d.
  • Keeps the guest alive while host cron scans.

Example log lines:

[guest] virtio-fs PCI device: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:05.0
[res] sandbox_id=kata-go-escape-test-1778522686-1539
[res] lookup_path_error=0 path=passthrough/kata-go-escape-test-1778522686-1539/rootfs/tmp/kata-go-escape-payload nodeid=21
[spray] pid=1 err=-2 created_candidates=1

err=-2 is expected for the symlink spray. virtiofsd can return ENOENT after the side effect because its follow-up lookup is still relative to the export root. The host symlink creation has already happened.

Impact

The PoC proves guest-root to host-root command execution.

Verified host proof:

/run/kata-go-escape.proof

uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) Mon May 11 18:05:01 UTC 2026

The proof file is written in host /run by host cron. It is not written by the guest process and not written by virtiofsd.

An attacker who reaches guest root can therefore cross the Kata isolation boundary and execute commands as host root on affected runtime-rs virtio-fs deployments.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
21%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

May 27, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47243(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers0.0.0-20260519062212-ffa59ce3aa78

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-31 07:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-27 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-23 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-05-27 23:04 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-47243?
CVE-2026-47243 is a high vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. Kata guest escape: runtime-rs guest-root to host-root escape via virtiofs Summary In the runtime-rs standalone virtio-fs path, verified here with QEMU (and verified with Cloud Hypervisor too), Kata Containers runs host virtiofsd as root with: If an attacker has root-equivalent execution inside the…
When was CVE-2026-47243 disclosed?
CVE-2026-47243 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-47243 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47243 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 78.9% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47243?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-47243, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47243

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47243?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.