CVE-2026-4648

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Use of an insecure cryptographic algorithm in the cashless payment system using NFC wristbands from CasfID Servicios Tecnológicos S.L.U. (version used at Resurrection Fest 2025), which employs cards based on MIFARE Classic technology (FM11RF08S). The cryptographic weakness of the authentication algorithm allows an attacker to retrieve access keys using techniques known as Backdoored Nested Attack, read the wristband’s entire contents, and clone its credentials onto a compatible rewritable card. Exploitation of this vulnerability could enable the impersonation of other attendees, the fraudulent use of the balance associated with their wristbands, and financial losses for both the affected users and the event organizers.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
31
EG Risk 31/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity68% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 28, 2026

Last Modified

July 28, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jul 28, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Insufficient Encryption Level in CasfID Servicios Tecnológicos NFC Wristbands | INCIBE-CERT | INCIBE

https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/insufficient-encryption-level-casfid-servicios-tecnologicos-nfc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-4648(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 186 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 86 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-07 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-04 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-02 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-02 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  4. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-01 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-01 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  7. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-09-29 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  10. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-09-28 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-28 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  13. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-09-25 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-25 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  18. 2026-09-23 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-23 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  20. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-22 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-22 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  23. 2026-09-20 11:21 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-20 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  25. 2026-09-19 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-19 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  27. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  29. 2026-09-17 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-17 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  31. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  33. 2026-09-15 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-15 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  35. 2026-09-14 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-14 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  37. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  38. 2026-09-13 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-13 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  40. 2026-09-12 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-12 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  42. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  43. 2026-09-11 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-11 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  45. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  46. 2026-09-10 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  47. 2026-09-09 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-09 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  49. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  50. 2026-09-07 20:56 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-07 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  52. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  53. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  54. 2026-09-06 10:19 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-06 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  56. 2026-09-05 11:36 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-05 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  58. 2026-09-04 12:04 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-04 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  60. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  61. 2026-09-01 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-01 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  63. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  64. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  65. 2026-09-01 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  66. 2026-08-30 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-30 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  68. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  69. 2026-08-29 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-29 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  71. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  72. 2026-08-27 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-27 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4x9m-p82w-8mmp
  74. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  75. 2026-08-26 23:20 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-4648?
CVE-2026-4648 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 28, 2026. Use of an insecure cryptographic algorithm in the cashless payment system using NFC wristbands from CasfID Servicios Tecnológicos S.L.U. (version used at Resurrection Fest 2025), which employs cards based on MIFARE Classic technology (FM11RF08S). The cryptographic weakness of the authentication…
When was CVE-2026-4648 made public?
CVE-2026-4648 was made public on July 28, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute, S.A. (INCIBE), gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 28, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-4648 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-4648 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-4648?
CVE-2026-4648 has a CVSS base score of 6.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-4648?
No fix for CVE-2026-4648 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-4648 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-4648

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-4648?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.