wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, an authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary workout log entries into any other user's SlotEntry by supplying the victim's slot_entry ID in a POST /api/v2/workoutlog/ request. The slot_entry foreign key is not included in the ownership verification performed by WorkoutLogViewSet.get_owner_objects(), so the server accepts and persists the cross-user reference without error. Because SlotEntry.get_config_data() retrieves associated logs via self.workoutlog_set.all() with no user filter, the attacker's injected data is silently folded into the victim's progressive-overload calculations, corrupting their auto-generated weight and repetition targets. Version 2.6 contains a patch.
CVE-2026-46438
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-07. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%The EG Score, 6.5 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 7, 2026
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 20262.6
Patch available: wger-project/wger 2.6
https://github.com/wger-project/wger/releases/tag/2.6Cross-User Data Corruption via Missing Ownership Check on WorkoutLog.slot_entry · Advisory · wger-project/wger · GitHub
https://github.com/wger-project/wger/security/advisories/GHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54xVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46438(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pip | wger | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wger | 1.1 ... 2.1 (14 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-10 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-08 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 18:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-07 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-07 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-07 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-07 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-07 14:08 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.5 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-07 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rjpf-7pf5-q54x · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-07 14:06 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-46438?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46438 published?
Is CVE-2026-46438 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46438?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46438?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46438
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46438?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.