CVE-2026-46295

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-08. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Do IRR scan in __kvm_apic_update_irr even if PIR is empty

Fall back to apic_find_highest_vector() when PID.ON is set but PIR turns out to be empty, to correctly report the highest pending interrupt from the existing IRR.

In a nested VM stress test, the following WARNING fires in vmx_check_nested_events() when kvm_cpu_has_interrupt() reports a pending interrupt but the subsequent kvm_apic_has_interrupt() (which invokes vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() again) returns -1:

WARNING: CPU: 99 PID: 57767 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4449 vmx_check_nested_events+0x6bf/0x6e0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: kvm_check_and_inject_events vcpu_enter_guest.constprop.0 vcpu_run kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run kvm_vcpu_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

The root cause is a race between vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() on the target vCPU and __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() on a sender vCPU. The sender performs two individually-atomic operations that are not a single transaction:

  • pi_test_and_set_pir(vector) -- sets the PIR bit
  • pi_test_and_set_on() -- sets PID.ON

The following interleaving triggers the bug:

Sender vCPU (IPI): Target vCPU (1st sync_pir_to_irr): B1: set PIR[vector] A1: pi_clear_on() A2: pi_harvest_pir() -> sees B1 bit A3: xchg() -> consumes bit, PIR=0 (1st sync returns correct max_irr) B2: set PID.ON = 1

Target vCPU (2nd sync_pir_to_irr): C1: pi_test_on() -> TRUE (from B2) C2: pi_clear_on() -> ON=0 C3: pi_harvest_pir() -> PIR empty C4: *max_irr = -1, early return IRR NOT SCANNED

The interrupt is not lost (it resides in the IRR from the first sync and is recovered on the next vcpu_enter_guest() iteration), but the incorrect max_irr causes a spurious WARNING and a wasted L2 VM-Enter/VM-Exit cycle.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 8, 2026

Last Modified

July 23, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: x86: Do IRR scan in __kvm_apic_update_irr even if PIR is empty - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb1703949dcaa9a49c338dee075f659f4634214d
generic

KVM: x86: Do IRR scan in __kvm_apic_update_irr even if PIR is empty - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b6b06a8b12bfd95f9015074b1430c1480908073
generic

KVM: x86: Do IRR scan in __kvm_apic_update_irr even if PIR is empty - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33fd0ccd2590b470b65adcca288615ad3b5e3e06

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46295(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.7-1~bpo13+1 (136 versions)7.0.7-1

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 187 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-14 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-31 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-31 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-31 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-23 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-21 10:30 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-21 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-21 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-20 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-20 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-20 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-17 07:14 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-17 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-17 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-16 06:15 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-16 06:15 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-16 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-15 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-15 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-15 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-14 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-14 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-14 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-13 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-13 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-13 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-12 02:14 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-12 02:14 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-12 02:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-11 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-11 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-11 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-10 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-10 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-10 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-08 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-08 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-08 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-07 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-07 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-07 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-06 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-06 21:15 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-06 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-05 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-05 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-05 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-04 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-04 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-04 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-03 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-03 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-03 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-02 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-02 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-02 11:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-01 10:49 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-01 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-01 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46295?
CVE-2026-46295 is a medium vulnerability published on June 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Do IRR scan in kvmapicupdate_irr even if PIR is empty Fall back to apicfindhighest_vector() when PID.ON is set but PIR turns out to be empty, to correctly report the highest pending interrupt from the existing IRR. In a…
When was CVE-2026-46295 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46295 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 8, 2026, with the most recent update on July 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46295 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46295 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46295?
CVE-2026-46295 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46295?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46295, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46295

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46295?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.