CVE-2026-46202

MEDIUMCVSS · not yet scored5.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-28.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues

The autodim code in hid-appletb-kbd takes backlight_device->ops_lock via backlight_device_set_brightness() -> mutex_lock() from two different atomic contexts:

* appletb_inactivity_timer() is a struct timer_list callback, so it runs in softirq context. Every expiry triggers

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:591 Call Trace: __might_resched __mutex_lock backlight_device_set_brightness appletb_inactivity_timer call_timer_fn run_timer_softirq

* reset_inactivity_timer() is called from appletb_kbd_hid_event() and appletb_kbd_inp_event(). On real USB hardware these run in softirq/IRQ context (URB completion and input-event dispatch). When the Touch Bar has already been dimmed or turned off, the reset path calls backlight_device_set_brightness() directly to restore brightness, producing the same warning.

Both call sites hit the same mutex_lock()-from-atomic bug. Fix them together by moving the blocking work onto the system workqueue:

* Convert the inactivity timer from struct timer_list to struct delayed_work; the callback (appletb_inactivity_work) now runs in process context where mutex_lock() is legal. * Add a dedicated struct work_struct restore_brightness_work and have reset_inactivity_timer() schedule it instead of calling backlight_device_set_brightness() directly.

Cancel both works synchronously during driver tear-down alongside the existing backlight reference drop.

The semantics are unchanged (same delays, same state transitions on dim, turn-off and user activity); only the execution context of the sleeping call changes. The timer field and callback are renamed to match their new type; reset_inactivity_timer() keeps its name because it is invoked from input event paths that read naturally as "reset the inactivity timer".

CVSS v3
EG Score
5.5(low)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

June 14, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 13, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c0830323689ef15224f0025276176988861b3b0
generic

HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2473a334c292af257ef68e33bc7760f4a8251812
generic

HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1654e53349d4e657b331de354313461f401f5063

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46202(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (135 versions)7.0.9-1

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 198 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-25 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-25 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-23 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-23 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-23 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-21 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-20 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-20 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-17 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-17 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-17 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-16 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-16 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-14 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-14 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-14 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-14 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-14 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-12 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-12 20:28 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-12 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-11 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-11 22:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-11 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-11 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-11 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-09 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-09 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-09 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-08 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-08 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-08 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-06 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-06 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-06 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-05 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-05 22:04 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-05 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-04 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-04 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-04 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-03 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-03 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-03 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-02 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-02 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-02 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-01 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-01 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-01 14:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-31 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-31 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-29 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-07-29 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-27 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-07-27 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-46202?
CVE-2026-46202 is a medium vulnerability published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: appletb-kbd: run inactivity autodim from workqueues The autodim code in hid-appletb-kbd takes backlightdevice->opslock via backlightdevicesetbrightness() -> mutexlock() from two different atomic contexts:…
When was CVE-2026-46202 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46202 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 28, 2026, with the most recent update on June 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46202 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46202 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.2% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46202?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46202, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46202

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46202?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.