CVE-2026-46169

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size

Syzbot reported a KMSAN uninit-value issue in hfsplus_strcasecmp(). The root cause is that hfs_brec_read() doesn't validate that the on-disk record size matches the expected size for the record type being read.

When mounting a corrupted filesystem, hfs_brec_read() may read less data than expected. For example, when reading a catalog thread record, the debug output showed:

HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: rec_len=520, fd->entrylength=26 HFSPLUS_BREC_READ: WARNING - entrylength (26) < rec_len (520) - PARTIAL READ!

hfs_brec_read() only validates that entrylength is not greater than the buffer size, but doesn't check if it's less than expected. It successfully reads 26 bytes into a 520-byte structure and returns success, leaving 494 bytes uninitialized.

This uninitialized data in tmp.thread.nodeName then gets copied by hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() and used by hfsplus_strcasecmp(), triggering the KMSAN warning when the uninitialized bytes are used as array indices in case_fold().

Fix by introducing hfsplus_brec_read_cat() wrapper that:

  • Calls hfs_brec_read() to read the data
  • Validates the record size based on the type field:
  • Fixed size for folder and file records
  • Variable size for thread records (depends on string length)
  • Returns -EIO if size doesn't match expected

For thread records, check against HFSPLUS_MIN_THREAD_SZ before reading nodeName.length to avoid reading uninitialized data at call sites that don't zero-initialize the entry structure.

Also initialize the tmp variable in hfsplus_find_cat() as defensive programming to ensure no uninitialized data even if validation is bypassed.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
3.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

June 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 19, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c91bbd6193c70a02c50c22e0fb1f60c3c5bd053a
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6b592275aeff184aa82fcf6abccd833fb71b393
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a420904450962a562ad053a41a53a27755021b48
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93e8d613f1a01b6637f387cc93f184cf7fb881d6
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8be69532e399eec9d9d990f6958b4ff2383b19b3
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61a790974ff7e533acbceca06c7d02f22bf96d4d
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bc337697c66db2e2a4a94f0509c282c1a014b86
generic

hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3003dbf62d151d47a6b90f71655292a51a05f244

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46169(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 104 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-16 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-16 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-11 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-08 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-08 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-02 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-02 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-29 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-06-29 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-28 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-27 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-27 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-06-25 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-25 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-24 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-24 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 15:13 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  28. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-18 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-17 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-17 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-15 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-15 23:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  40. 2026-06-14 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-14 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-13 21:44 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  44. 2026-06-13 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-11 13:11 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  49. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-07 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-01 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46169?
CVE-2026-46169 is a medium vulnerability published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hfsplus: fix uninit-value by validating catalog record size Syzbot reported a KMSAN uninit-value issue in hfsplus_strcasecmp(). The root cause is that hfsbrecread() doesn't validate that the on-disk record size matches the expected…
When was CVE-2026-46169 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46169 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 28, 2026, with the most recent update on June 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46169 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46169 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46169?
CVE-2026-46169 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46169?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46169, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-46169

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46169?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.