CVE-2026-46116

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete

KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435

Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net

The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains.

__xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates:

if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi);

while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev.

The defensive change here:

  • Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst,
bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc().
  • Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for
byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields.

Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash.

Reproduction:

  • Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV
  • syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db
  • 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal
  • 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state
lifecycle

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4a53add2fa8f1b5aa17d4c5686c320785fab182
Web page

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2e2d08fb070fab4947447171f1c4e3ca5a188e5
Web page

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4980162de555cb838f1a189ce7d2cbf5d2e7b050
Web page

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0
Web page

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3

Patch Availability(25)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1122.131) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1056.57~22.04.2) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1058.61) @ noble2026-10-15ubuntu
redhatkpatch-patch2026-08-24redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-372.204.1.el8_62026-07-31redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:5.14.0-284.183.1.rt14.468.el9_22026-07-30redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-305.199.1.el8_42026-07-30redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-477.156.1.el8_82026-07-29redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.183.1.el9_22026-07-29redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.129.1.el9_62026-07-23redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.139.1.el9_42026-07-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.37.1.el10_22026-07-21redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:3.10.0-1160.156.1.rt56.1308.el72026-07-17redhat
redhatkernel-0:3.10.0-1160.156.1.el72026-07-17redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.144.1.el8_102026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.88.1.el10_02026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.144.1.rt7.485.el8_102026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.22.1.el9_82026-07-06redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.261 (fixes >=2.6.19)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.262-1: fixed in 5.10.262-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.176-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.88-1~bpo12+1 (21 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.88-1: fixed in 6.12.88-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.7-1~bpo13+1 (137 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.7-1: fixed in 7.0.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 357 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 257 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-15 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-15 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-15 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-15 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 04:43 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-09-15 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-15 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-15 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  13. 2026-09-15 12:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-15 12:13 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-15 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-14 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-08 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-08 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-08 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  28. 2026-09-08 09:00 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-08 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-08 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-08-25 13:24 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-25 13:24 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-25 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  45. 2026-08-25 12:19 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-25 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-25 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-08-25 04:57 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-25 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-25 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  51. 2026-08-23 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-23 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-23 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  55. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-21 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  58. 2026-08-21 00:47 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-21 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-21 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  61. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  66. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  67. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  68. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  70. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-96hg-7p79-ggx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  74. 2026-08-16 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-16 02:40 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46116?
CVE-2026-46116 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrmstate lists in xfrmstate_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in xfrmstatedelete()'s hlistdelrcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46116 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-46116 was published on May 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-46116 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46116 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46116?
CVE-2026-46116 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46116?
A fix for CVE-2026-46116 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-46116 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46116

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46116?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.