CVE-2026-46110

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-28. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted

The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each hardware RX queue, the CPU and MAC coordinate through a shared ring array of DMA descriptors: one descriptor per DMA buffer. Each descriptor includes the buffer's physical address and a status flag ("OWN") indicating which side owns the buffer: OWN=0 for CPU, OWN=1 for MAC. The CPU is only allowed to set the flag and the MAC is only allowed to clear it, and both must move through the ring in sequence: thus the ring is used for both "submissions" and "completions."

In the stmmac driver, stmmac_rx() bookmarks its position in the ring with the cur_rx index. The main receive loop in that function checks for rx_descs[cur_rx].own=0, gives the corresponding buffer to the network stack (NULLing the pointer), and increments cur_rx modulo the ring size. After the loop exits, stmmac_rx_refill(), which bookmarks its position with dirty_rx, allocates fresh buffers and rearms the descriptors (setting OWN=1). If it fails any allocation, it simply stops early (leaving OWN=0) and will retry where it left off when next called.

This means descriptors have a three-stage lifecycle (terms my own):

  • empty (OWN=1, buffer valid)
  • full (OWN=0, buffer valid and populated)
  • dirty (OWN=0, buffer NULL)

But because stmmac_rx() only checks OWN, it confuses full/dirty. In the past (see 'Fixes:'), there was a bug where the loop could cycle cur_rx all the way back to the first descriptor it dirtied, resulting in a NULL dereference when mistaken for full. The aforementioned commit resolved that *specific* failure by capping the loop's iteration limit at dma_rx_size - 1, but this is only a partial fix: if the previous stmmac_rx_refill() didn't complete, then there are leftover dirty descriptors that the loop might encounter without needing to cycle fully around. The current code therefore panics (see 'Closes:') when stmmac_rx_refill() is memory-starved long enough for cur_rx to catch up to dirty_rx.

Fix this by explicitly checking, before advancing cur_rx, if the next entry is dirty; exit the loop if so. This prevents processing of the final, used descriptor until stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, but fully prevents the cur_rx == dirty_rx ambiguity as the previous bugfix intended: so remove the clamp as well. Since stmmac_rx_zc() is a copy-paste-and-tweak of stmmac_rx() and the code structure is identical, any fix to stmmac_rx() will also need a corresponding fix for stmmac_rx_zc(). Therefore, apply the same check there.

In stmmac_rx() (not stmmac_rx_zc()), a related bug remains: after the MAC sets OWN=0 on the final descriptor, it will be unable to send any further DMA-complete IRQs until it's given more empty descriptors. Currently, the driver simply *hopes* that the next stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, risking an indefinite stall of the receive process if not. But this is not a regression, so it can be addressed in a future change.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1c50b273298c7cd9b08b113e7a7598b531a02f5
generic

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/950cb436165aad0f8f2cd49da3cd07677465bcde
generic

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c910f7708e3c507b037ca91ca5b09f8cfe71e65
generic

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4af2e62cbcda575a174acd230c3f3a208135e16d
generic

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0bb05e6adfa99a2ea1fee1125cc0953409f83ed8

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46110(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(22)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2050.52) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-136.136) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.72+fips1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1058.61) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.8.0-1058.61~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.62.1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64+1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.71) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1062.69) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1063.71+fips2) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1061.64+fips1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1033.34) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16~24.04.1) @ noble2026-08-25ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-08-25ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.88-1~bpo12+1 (21 versions)6.12.88-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.7-1~bpo13+1 (133 versions)7.0.7-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 87× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 285 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-25 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-25 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-25 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-23 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-23 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-21 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-21 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-14 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-14 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-13 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-13 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-12 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-12 14:06 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-12 14:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-12 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-12 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-12 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-11 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-11 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-11 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-11 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-11 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-10 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-10 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-09 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-09 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-09 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-09 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-09 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-08 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-08 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-08 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-08 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-08 03:12 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-08 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-07 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-07 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-07 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-07 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-06 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-06 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-06 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-06 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-06 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-06 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-05 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-05 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-05 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-04 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-04 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-03 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-03 16:16 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46110?
CVE-2026-46110 is a high vulnerability published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each…
When was CVE-2026-46110 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46110 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 28, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46110 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46110 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 59.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46110?
CVE-2026-46110 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.5 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46110?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46110, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46110

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46110?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.