CVE-2026-46110

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted

The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each hardware RX queue, the CPU and MAC coordinate through a shared ring array of DMA descriptors: one descriptor per DMA buffer. Each descriptor includes the buffer's physical address and a status flag ("OWN") indicating which side owns the buffer: OWN=0 for CPU, OWN=1 for MAC. The CPU is only allowed to set the flag and the MAC is only allowed to clear it, and both must move through the ring in sequence: thus the ring is used for both "submissions" and "completions."

In the stmmac driver, stmmac_rx() bookmarks its position in the ring with the cur_rx index. The main receive loop in that function checks for rx_descs[cur_rx].own=0, gives the corresponding buffer to the network stack (NULLing the pointer), and increments cur_rx modulo the ring size. After the loop exits, stmmac_rx_refill(), which bookmarks its position with dirty_rx, allocates fresh buffers and rearms the descriptors (setting OWN=1). If it fails any allocation, it simply stops early (leaving OWN=0) and will retry where it left off when next called.

This means descriptors have a three-stage lifecycle (terms my own):

  • empty (OWN=1, buffer valid)
  • full (OWN=0, buffer valid and populated)
  • dirty (OWN=0, buffer NULL)

But because stmmac_rx() only checks OWN, it confuses full/dirty. In the past (see 'Fixes:'), there was a bug where the loop could cycle cur_rx all the way back to the first descriptor it dirtied, resulting in a NULL dereference when mistaken for full. The aforementioned commit resolved that *specific* failure by capping the loop's iteration limit at dma_rx_size - 1, but this is only a partial fix: if the previous stmmac_rx_refill() didn't complete, then there are leftover dirty descriptors that the loop might encounter without needing to cycle fully around. The current code therefore panics (see 'Closes:') when stmmac_rx_refill() is memory-starved long enough for cur_rx to catch up to dirty_rx.

Fix this by explicitly checking, before advancing cur_rx, if the next entry is dirty; exit the loop if so. This prevents processing of the final, used descriptor until stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, but fully prevents the cur_rx == dirty_rx ambiguity as the previous bugfix intended: so remove the clamp as well. Since stmmac_rx_zc() is a copy-paste-and-tweak of stmmac_rx() and the code structure is identical, any fix to stmmac_rx() will also need a corresponding fix for stmmac_rx_zc(). Therefore, apply the same check there.

In stmmac_rx() (not stmmac_rx_zc()), a related bug remains: after the MAC sets OWN=0 on the final descriptor, it will be unable to send any further DMA-complete IRQs until it's given more empty descriptors. Currently, the driver simply *hopes* that the next stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, risking an indefinite stall of the receive process if not. But this is not a regression, so it can be addressed in a future change.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1c50b273298c7cd9b08b113e7a7598b531a02f5
Web page

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/950cb436165aad0f8f2cd49da3cd07677465bcde
Web page

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c910f7708e3c507b037ca91ca5b09f8cfe71e65
Web page

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4af2e62cbcda575a174acd230c3f3a208135e16d
Web page

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0bb05e6adfa99a2ea1fee1125cc0953409f83ed8

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46110(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(24)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-136.136) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1058.61) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.8.0-1058.61~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.62.1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64+1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2050.52) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.72+fips1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.71) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1062.69) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1063.71+fips2) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1061.64+fips1) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1033.34) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-09-14ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.1.176 (fixes >=0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.176-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.88-1~bpo12+1 (21 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.88-1: fixed in 6.12.88-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.7-1~bpo13+1 (137 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.7-1: fixed in 7.0.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(23)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 335 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 235 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-15 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-15 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  9. 2026-10-15 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-15 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  19. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  20. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  22. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 16:48 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  3. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  4. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  5. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  7. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  9. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  10. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  11. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  12. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  14. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  18. 2026-09-13 03:09 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  20. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  22. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  23. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  24. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  25. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  26. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  27. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  28. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  29. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  30. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  31. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  32. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  33. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  34. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  35. 2026-08-25 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-25 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-25 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  38. 2026-08-23 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-23 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-23 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  42. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  43. 2026-08-21 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-21 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-21 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  48. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  49. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-20 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  53. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  55. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-17 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-16 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-16 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  65. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  69. 2026-08-14 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-14 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-14 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5hfj-3vgw-hm4r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  75. 2026-08-13 02:24 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46110?
CVE-2026-46110 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46110 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-46110 was published on May 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-46110 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46110 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46110?
CVE-2026-46110 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46110?
A fix for CVE-2026-46110 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-46110 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46110

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46110?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.