CVE-2026-46081

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-27. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: acomp - fix wrong pointer stored by acomp_save_req()

acomp_save_req() stores &req->chain in req->base.data. When acomp_reqchain_done() is invoked on asynchronous completion, it receives &req->chain as the data argument but casts it directly to struct acomp_req. Since data points to the chain member, all subsequent field accesses are at a wrong offset, resulting in memory corruption.

The issue occurs when an asynchronous hardware implementation, such as the QAT driver, completes a request that uses the DMA virtual address interface (e.g. acomp_request_set_src_dma()). This combination causes crypto_acomp_compress() to enter the acomp_do_req_chain() path, which sets acomp_reqchain_done() as the completion callback via acomp_save_req().

With KASAN enabled, this manifests as a general protection fault in acomp_reqchain_done():

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe000040000000000 KASAN: probably user-memory-access in range [0x0000400000000000-0x0000400000000007] RIP: 0010:acomp_reqchain_done+0x15b/0x4e0 Call Trace: qat_comp_alg_callback+0x5d/0xa0 [intel_qat] adf_ring_response_handler+0x376/0x8b0 [intel_qat] adf_response_handler+0x60/0x170 [intel_qat] tasklet_action_common+0x223/0x820 handle_softirqs+0x1ab/0x640

Fix this by storing the request itself in req->base.data instead of &req->chain, so that acomp_reqchain_done() receives the correct pointer. Simplify acomp_restore_req() accordingly to access req->chain directly.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 3, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

crypto: acomp - fix wrong pointer stored by acomp_save_req() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7e20b9bd6c990773cf0c09e2642250b8a70263d
generic

crypto: acomp - fix wrong pointer stored by acomp_save_req() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/343a5bf68a8ff9affcf2b70677ea4cf40c195ee4
generic

crypto: acomp - fix wrong pointer stored by acomp_save_req() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a2785e5985627f2265ba7775949601a29ba0d1e

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46081(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.4-1~bpo13+1 (134 versions)7.0.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 267 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-14 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-14 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-14 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-13 03:39 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 15:05 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-23 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-21 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-21 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-21 20:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-20 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-20 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-20 11:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-20 11:22 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-20 11:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-16 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-16 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-16 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-14 23:38 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-14 23:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-14 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-14 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-14 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-13 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-13 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-12 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-12 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-12 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-12 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-12 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-11 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-11 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-11 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-10 06:39 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-10 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-09 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-09 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-09 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-09 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-09 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-08 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-08 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-08 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-08 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-08 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-07 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-07 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-07 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-07 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-07 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-07 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-07 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-07 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-06 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-06 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-06 00:47 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46081?
CVE-2026-46081 is a high vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: acomp - fix wrong pointer stored by acompsavereq() acompsavereq() stores &req->chain in req->base.data. When acompreqchaindone() is invoked on asynchronous completion, it receives &req->chain as the data argument but casts…
When was CVE-2026-46081 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46081 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46081 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46081 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46081?
CVE-2026-46081 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46081?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46081, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46081

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46081?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.