CVE-2026-46052

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed

Ceph can call d_add(dentry, NULL) on a negative dentry that is already present in the primary dcache hash.

In the current VFS that is not safe. d_add() goes through __d_add() to __d_rehash(), which unconditionally reinserts dentry->d_hash into the hlist_bl bucket. If the dentry is already hashed, reinserting the same node can corrupt the bucket, including creating a self-loop. Once that happens, __d_lookup() can spin forever in the hlist_bl walk, typically looping only on the d_name.hash mismatch check and eventually triggering RCU stall reports like this one:

rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 87-....: (2100 ticks this GP) idle=3a4c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25003319/25003319 fqs=829 rcu: (t=2101 jiffies g=79058445 q=698988 ncpus=192) CPU: 87 UID: 2952868916 PID: 3933303 Comm: php-cgi8.3 Not tainted 6.18.17-i1-amd #950 NONE Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7615/0G9DHV, BIOS 1.6.6 09/22/2023 RIP: 0010:__d_lookup+0x46/0xb0 Code: c1 e8 07 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 00 49 89 fc 49 89 f5 48 89 c3 48 83 e3 fe 48 83 f8 01 77 0f eb 2d 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 1b 48 85 db <74> 20 39 6b 18 75 f3 48 8d 7b 78 e8 ba 85 d0 00 4c 39 63 10 74 1f RSP: 0018:ff745a70c8253898 EFLAGS: 00000282 RAX: ff26e470054cb208 RBX: ff26e470054cb208 RCX: 000000006e958966 RDX: ff26e48267340000 RSI: ff745a70c82539b0 RDI: ff26e458f74655c0 RBP: 000000006e958966 R08: 0000000000000180 R09: 9cd08d909b919a89 R10: ff26e458f74655c0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff26e458f74655c0 R13: ff745a70c82539b0 R14: d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0 R15: 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f FS: 00007f5770896980(0000) GS:ff26e482c5d88000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5764de50c0 CR3: 000000a72abb5001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: lookup_fast+0x9f/0x100 walk_component+0x1f/0x150 link_path_walk+0x20e/0x3d0 path_lookupat+0x68/0x180 filename_lookup+0xdc/0x1e0 vfs_statx+0x6c/0x140 vfs_fstatat+0x67/0xa0 __do_sys_newfstatat+0x24/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

This is reachable with reused cached negative dentries. A Ceph lookup or atomic_open can be handed a negative dentry that is already hashed, and fs/ceph/dir.c then hits one of two paths that incorrectly assume "negative" also means "unhashed":

  • ceph_finish_lookup():
MDS reply is -ENOENT with no trace -> d_add(dentry, NULL)
  • ceph_lookup():
local ENOENT fast path for a complete directory with shared caps -> d_add(dentry, NULL)

Both paths can therefore re-add an already-hashed negative dentry.

Ceph already uses the correct pattern elsewhere: ceph_fill_trace() only calls d_add(dn, NULL) for a negative null-dentry reply when d_unhashed(dn) is true.

Fix both fs/ceph/dir.c sites the same way: only call d_add() for a negative dentry when it is actually unhashed. If the negative dentry is already hashed, leave it in place and reuse it as-is.

This preserves the existing behavior for unhashed dentries while avoiding d_hash list corruption for reused hashed negatives.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EPSS
39.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 6, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b91e535f208c48a5e7464f1aa38338a30e7912df
generic

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83ce43a21bb7df8dd52228afdd918d2d058eefde
generic

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/803447f93d75ab6e40c85e6d12b5630d281d70d6
generic

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4179cc390dacebc87079419ec92f86f3dc46294d
generic

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2010cb06b9df7d3c816c78358c566bdacbdf38ff

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46052(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 181 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-11 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-11 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-08 23:51 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-08 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-07-01 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-30 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-06-30 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-06-29 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-29 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-06-29 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-28 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-06-28 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-28 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-06-28 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-27 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-06-27 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-06-27 05:56 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-27 05:56 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-06-27 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-26 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-26 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-06-26 17:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-06-26 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-26 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-06-26 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-25 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-25 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-06-25 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 01:07 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-25 01:07 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-06-25 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-17 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-17 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-17 04:51 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-17 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-16 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-16 16:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-16 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-06-16 02:15 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-06-16 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-15 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-06-15 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-06-15 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-14 22:07 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-14 22:07 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-06-14 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-06-14 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-14 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-06-14 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-13 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-06-13 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-06-13 06:47 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46052?
CVE-2026-46052 is a high vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed Ceph can call d_add(dentry, NULL) on a negative dentry that is already present in the primary dcache hash. In the current VFS that is not safe. dadd() goes through dadd()…
When was CVE-2026-46052 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46052 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46052 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46052 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 39.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46052?
CVE-2026-46052 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46052?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46052, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-46052

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46052?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.