CVE-2026-45990

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc()

Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA node, even when the object is being shrunk.

This introduced two bugs in the reallocation fallback path:

  • Data loss during NUMA migration: The jump to 'alloc_new' happens
before 'ks' and 'orig_size' are initialized. As a result, the memcpy() in the 'alloc_new' block would copy 0 bytes into the new allocation.
  • Buffer overflow during shrinking: When shrinking an object while
forcing a new alignment, 'new_size' is smaller than the old size. However, the memcpy() used the old size ('orig_size ?: ks'), leading to an out-of-bounds write.

The same overflow bug exists in the kvrealloc() fallback path, where the old bucket size ksize(p) is copied into the new buffer without being bounded by the new size.

A simple reproducer:

// e.g. add to lkdtm as KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW while (1) { void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL); p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE); kfree(p); }

demonstrates the issue:

================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds write in memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130

Out-of-bounds write at 0xffff8883ad757038 (120B right of kfence-#47): memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x1c8/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ...

kfence-#47: 0xffff8883ad756fc0-0xffff8883ad756fff, size=64, cache=kmalloc-64

allocated by task 316 on cpu 7 at 97.680481s (0.021813s ago): krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x19c/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... ==================================================================

Fix it by moving the old size calculation to the top of __do_krealloc() and bounding all copy lengths by the new allocation size.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 16, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/550fa6b5aabb096554536ac1e3ec96b76cbb35fd
generic

slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38387ccc0fbe38d14fb4c2ad7ee1d7404e5e59fd
generic

slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/082a6d03a2d685a83a332666b500ad3966349588

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45990(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.4-1~bpo13+1 (134 versions)7.0.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 202 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-14 08:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-14 08:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-14 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 04:09 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 15:23 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-23 15:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-21 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-21 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-21 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-20 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-20 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-20 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-15 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-15 00:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-14 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-14 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-14 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-12 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-12 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-12 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-11 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-11 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-11 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-11 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-11 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-09 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-09 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-09 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-08 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-08 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-08 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-07 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-06 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-06 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-06 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-03 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-03 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-03 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-02 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-02 14:18 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-02 14:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-01 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-01 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-01 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-31 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-07-31 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-07-31 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45990?
CVE-2026-45990 is a medium vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA…
When was CVE-2026-45990 disclosed?
CVE-2026-45990 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-45990 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45990 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45990?
CVE-2026-45990 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45990?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-45990, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45990

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45990?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.