In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/mlx5: Fix UMR hang in LAG error state unload
During firmware reset in LAG mode, a race condition causes the driver
to hang indefinitely while waiting for UMR completion during device
unload. See [1].
In LAG mode the bond device is only registered on the master, so it
never sees sys_error events from the slave.
During firmware reset this causes UMR waits to hang forever on unload
as the slave is dead but the master hasn't entered error state yet, so
UMR posts succeed but completions never arrive.
Fix this by adding a sys_error notifier that gets registered before
MLX5_IB_STAGE_IB_REG and stays alive until after ib_unregister_device().
This ensures error events reach the bond device throughout teardown.
[1]
Call Trace:
__schedule+0x2bd/0x760
schedule+0x37/0xa0
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10
__mutex_lock.isra.6+0x2b5/0x4a0
__mlx5_ib_dereg_mr+0x606/0x870 [mlx5_ib]
? __xa_erase+0x4a/0xa0
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? wait_for_completion+0x31/0x100
ib_dereg_mr_user+0x48/0xc0 [ib_core]
? rdmacg_uncharge_hierarchy+0xa0/0x100
destroy_hw_idr_uobject+0x20/0x50 [ib_uverbs]
uverbs_destroy_uobject+0x37/0x150 [ib_uverbs]
__uverbs_cleanup_ufile+0xda/0x140 [ib_uverbs]
uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0x3a/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
ib_uverbs_remove_one+0xc3/0x140 [ib_uverbs]
remove_client_context+0x8b/0xd0 [ib_core]
disable_device+0x8c/0x130 [ib_core]
__ib_unregister_device+0x10d/0x180 [ib_core]
ib_unregister_device+0x21/0x30 [ib_core]
__mlx5_ib_remove+0x1e4/0x1f0 [mlx5_ib]
auxiliary_bus_remove+0x1e/0x30
device_release_driver_internal+0x103/0x1f0
bus_remove_device+0xf7/0x170
device_del+0x181/0x410
mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked.part.10+0xa9/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_disable_lag+0x253/0x260 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_disable_change+0x89/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_eswitch_disable+0x67/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_unload+0x15/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_unload_one+0x71/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_sync_reset_reload_work+0x83/0x100 [mlx5_core]
process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
worker_thread+0x30/0x390
? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
kthread+0x116/0x130
? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it