CVE-2026-45913

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-32379 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: bridge: mcast: always update mdb_n_entries for vlan contexts

syzbot triggered a warning[1] about the number of mdb entries in a context. It turned out that there are multiple ways to trigger that warning today (some got added during the years), the root cause of the problem is that the increase is done conditionally, and over the years these different conditions increased so there were new ways to trigger the warning, that is to do a decrease which wasn't paired with a previous increase.

For example one way to trigger it is with flush: $ ip l add br0 up type bridge vlan_filtering 1 mcast_snooping 1 $ ip l add dumdum up master br0 type dummy $ bridge mdb add dev br0 port dumdum grp 239.0.0.1 permanent vid 1 $ ip link set dev br0 down $ ip link set dev br0 type bridge mcast_vlan_snooping 1 ^^^^ this will enable snooping, but will not update mdb_n_entries because in __br_multicast_enable_port_ctx() we check !netif_running $ bridge mdb flush dev br0 ^^^ this will trigger the warning because it will delete the pg which we added above, which will try to decrease mdb_n_entries

Fix the problem by removing the conditional increase and always keep the count up-to-date while the vlan exists. In order to do that we have to first initialize it on port-vlan context creation, and then always increase or decrease the value regardless of mcast options. To keep the current behaviour we have to enforce the mdb limit only if the context is port's or if the port-vlan's mcast snooping is enabled.

[1] ------------[ cut here ]------------ n == 0 WARNING: net/bridge/br_multicast.c:718 at br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec_one net/bridge/br_multicast.c:718 [inline], CPU#0: syz.4.4607/22043 WARNING: net/bridge/br_multicast.c:718 at br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec net/bridge/br_multicast.c:771 [inline], CPU#0: syz.4.4607/22043 WARNING: net/bridge/br_multicast.c:718 at br_multicast_del_pg+0x1bbe/0x1e20 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:825, CPU#0: syz.4.4607/22043 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 22043 Comm: syz.4.4607 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/24/2026 RIP: 0010:br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec_one net/bridge/br_multicast.c:718 [inline] RIP: 0010:br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec net/bridge/br_multicast.c:771 [inline] RIP: 0010:br_multicast_del_pg+0x1bbe/0x1e20 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:825 Code: 41 5f 5d e9 04 7a 48 f7 e8 3f 73 5c f7 90 0f 0b 90 e9 cf fd ff ff e8 31 73 5c f7 90 0f 0b 90 e9 16 fd ff ff e8 23 73 5c f7 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 60 fd ff ff e8 15 73 5c f7 eb 05 e8 0e 73 5c f7 48 8b RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c207220 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff8a68042d RBX: ffff88807c6f1800 RCX: ffff888066e90000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff888066e90000 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 000000000000000c R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8880303ef800 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff888050eb11c4 R15: 1ffff1100a1d6238 FS: 00007fa45921b6c0(0000) GS:ffff8881256f5000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa4591f9ff8 CR3: 0000000081df2000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: br_mdb_flush_pgs net/bridge/br_mdb.c:1525 [inline] br_mdb_flush net/bridge/br_mdb.c:1544 [inline] br_mdb_del_bulk+0x5e2/0xb20 net/bridge/br_mdb.c:1561 rtnl_mdb_del+0x48a/0x640 net/core/rtnetlink.c:-1 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x77e/0xbe0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6967 netlink_rcv_skb+0x232/0x4b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x80f/0x9b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344 netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:727 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:742 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xa68/0xad0 net/socket.c:2592 ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socke ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: bridge: mcast: always update mdb_n_entries for vlan contexts - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/724a405ce0309676f1e993c173382b4c4a022beb
Web page

net: bridge: mcast: always update mdb_n_entries for vlan contexts - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45525fdfd4cb612d7b414dd5cfa1f43892a7cd71

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45913(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (104 versions)
  • every version up to 6.18.14-1: fixed in 6.18.14-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 263 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 163 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-11-06 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  3. 2026-11-06 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-06 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  5. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 15:25 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  14. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-22 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-22 23:32 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-22 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  24. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-18 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-10-12 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 18:51 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  32. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  35. 2026-09-14 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-14 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-14 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  38. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  39. 2026-09-13 04:09 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  41. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  43. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  44. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  45. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  46. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  48. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  52. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  53. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  54. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  55. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  56. 2026-08-25 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-25 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-25 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  59. 2026-08-23 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-23 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-23 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  62. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  63. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  64. 2026-08-21 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-21 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-21 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  67. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  68. 2026-08-20 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-20 17:41 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-20 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wpm7-9hcr-ppjf · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  71. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  72. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  73. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  74. 2026-08-17 09:21 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-17 09:21 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45913?
CVE-2026-45913 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: bridge: mcast: always update mdb_n_entries for vlan contexts syzbot triggered a warning[1] about the number of mdb entries in a context. It turned out that there are multiple ways to trigger that warning today (some got added…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45913 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-45913 was published on May 27, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-45913 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45913 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45913?
CVE-2026-45913 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45913?
A fix for CVE-2026-45913 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-45913 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45913

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45913?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.