CVE-2026-45858

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1

When allocating initialized blocks from a large unwritten extent, or when splitting an unwritten extent during end I/O and converting it to initialized, there is currently a potential issue of stale data if the extent needs to be split in the middle.

0 A B N [UUUUUUUUUUUU] U: unwritten extent [--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data |<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized

ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack of space. It zeroout B to N and mark the entire extent from 0 to N as written.

0 A B N [WWWWWWWWWWWW] W: written extent [SSDDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed, S: stale data

ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and left a stale written extent from 0 to A.

0 A B N [WW|WWWWWWWWWW] [SS|DDDDDDDDZZ]

Fix this by pass EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 to ext4_split_extent_at() when splitting at B, don't convert the entire extent to written and left it as unwritten after zeroing out B to N. The remaining work is just like the standard two-part split. ext4_split_extent() will pass the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag when it calls ext4_split_extent_at() for the second time, allowing it to properly handle the split. If the split is successful, it will keep extent from 0 to A as unwritten.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 25, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d67c8ecf3d8fda9b8ef80e6f665d84b6d6ac9d88
generic

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d17857b4fb9ba5745b59be0ef38fd532991fccbf
generic

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7015fcf473796e1d2d876f241bd9e0c36f3d4eef
generic

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58ddae5d77b1db3a27b891c75a8fa120239ac092
generic

ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bf6974822d1dba86cf11b5f05498581cf3488a2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45858(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (100 versions)6.18.14-1

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 185 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-25 05:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-25 05:52 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-25 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-23 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-23 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-21 21:01 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-21 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-20 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-20 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-17 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-17 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-17 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-16 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-16 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-14 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-14 03:53 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-14 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-13 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-13 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-13 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-12 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-12 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-12 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-10 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-10 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-10 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-08 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-08 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-08 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-07 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-07 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-07 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-06 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-06 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-06 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-05 20:56 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-05 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-05 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-03 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-03 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-03 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-02 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-02 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-02 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-01 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-01 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-01 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-31 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-07-31 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-29 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-07-29 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-26 06:12 UTCOSV refresh
  71. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45858?
CVE-2026-45858 is a medium vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4EXTDATAPARTIALVALID1 When allocating initialized blocks from a large unwritten extent, or when splitting an unwritten extent during end I/O and converting it to initialized, there is…
When was CVE-2026-45858 disclosed?
CVE-2026-45858 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-45858 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45858 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45858?
CVE-2026-45858 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45858?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-45858, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45858

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45858?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.