OpenSIPS is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server implementation. In versions 4.0.0 and prior, processing a SIP message with a header name longer than 255 bytes causes a stack buffer overflow when sip_to_json() is called in the routing script. Function sip_to_json() (modules/sipmsgops/sipmsgops.c) copies SIP header names into a fixed 255-byte stack buffer without bounds checking, performing a memcpy of the full header-name length even though the SIP parser imposes no such limit (a header name can be roughly 65000 bytes). As a result, when a routing script calls sip_to_json(), a SIP message with a header name longer than 255 bytes triggers a stack buffer overflow in which both the length and content of the overwrite are attacker-controlled, corrupting the saved frame pointer and return address. A single unauthenticated UDP packet to the SIP port (5060) can crash the process or, on builds without stack protections, hijack the return address to achieve remote code execution. This affects deployments whose routing script invokes sip_to_json(). This issue was not fixed at the time of publication.
CVE-2026-45538
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 60% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- 75(Attend)EG Risk 75/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 40%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 4, 2026
Last Modified
August 5, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026Stack Buffer Overflow in sip_to_json() Header Name Copy · Advisory · OpenSIPS/opensips · GitHub
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/security/advisories/GHSA-37wc-5j8j-95x3Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 51× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
Show 26 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 18:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 21:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-45538?
When was CVE-2026-45538 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-45538 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45538?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45538?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-45538
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45538?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.