OpenSIPS is a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server implementation. Versions 3.4.0 through 3.6.5 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the presence module. When the presence module's handle_publish() function processes a SIP PUBLISH request with an Event: presence header and a message body while the configuration option enable_sphere_check=1 is set, it invokes the get_content_type() macro without first calling parse_content_type_hdr(), causing it to dereference uninitialized or NULL Content-Type parsing state and crash. If a Content-Type header is present but unparsed, msg->content_type->parsed is NULL and is dereferenced as a content_t pointer; if the request lacks a Content-Type header entirely, msg->content_type itself is NULL, and both cases lead to a crash. A remote attacker can therefore cause a denial of service against an affected instance with a single PUBLISH request over UDP or TCP, using either a valid Content-Type: application/pidf+xml request or one with the header removed, and the vulnerable code path itself does not enforce authentication (though a deployment's routing configuration may require it before this route is reached). The issue has been fixed in version 3.6.6 and 4.0.0-rc1.
CVE-2026-45084
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 70EG Risk 70/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity87% × 45%The EG Score, 8.7 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 4, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026denial of service in `presence.handle_publish()` from unchecked Content-Type state · Advisory · OpenSIPS/opensips · GitHub
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/security/advisories/GHSA-h3ww-hchh-x2g9Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 119 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 19 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-05 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-04 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-01 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-29 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-25 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-22 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-20 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-17 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-15 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-13 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-10 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-09 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-07 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-05 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 04:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-03 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-30 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-29 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-28 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-26 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-24 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 10:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-22 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-21 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-19 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-18 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-17 23:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-17 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-16 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-15 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-14 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-45084?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45084 published?
Is CVE-2026-45084 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45084?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45084?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-45084
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45084?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.