CVE-2026-45016

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from the CNA's CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS

Also known asGHSA-c8m7-r2jv-rw63 (GitHub Security Advisories)

6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

EGroupware Vulnerable to Local File Inclusion via file:// URI in Mail Compose

Summary

The function processes image URLs embedded in an HTML email body without validating or restricting URI schemes. The check !str_starts_with($myUrl, 'http') evaluates to true for file:// URIs, causing file_get_contents($basedir . urldecode($myUrl)) to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem and embed them as inline MIME attachments in outgoing email.

str_starts_with('file:///etc/passwd', 'http') → false !false → true

// api/src/Mail.php  
foreach($images[2] as $i => $url)
			{
				//$isData = false;
				$basedir = $data = '';
				$needTempFile = true;
				$attachmentData = ['name' => '', 'type' => '', 'file' => '', 'tmp_name' => ''];
				try
				{
					// do not change urls for absolute images (thanks to corvuscorax)
					if (!str_starts_with($url, 'data:'))
					{
						$attachmentData['name'] = basename($url); // need to resolve all sort of url
						if (($directory = dirname($url)) == '.') $directory = '';
						$ext = pathinfo($attachmentData['name'], PATHINFO_EXTENSION);
						$attachmentData['type'] = MimeMagic::ext2mime($ext);
						if ( strlen($directory) > 1 && !str_ends_with($directory, '/')) { $directory .= '/'; }
..
...
....
// processURL2InlineImages function
if ( $myUrl[0]!='/' && strlen($basedir) > 1 && !str_ends_with($basedir, '/')) { $basedir .= '/'; }
						if ($needTempFile && empty($attachment) && !str_starts_with($myUrl, "http"))
						{
							try {
								$data = file_get_contents($basedir.urldecode($myUrl));
							}
							catch (\Throwable $e) {
								_egw_log_exception($e);
							}
						}
					}
					if (str_starts_with($url, 'data:'))

PoC

  • Log in as any authenticated EGroupware user with mail access and open the mail compose window.
  • Switch to HTML body mode and insert: `.
  • The server executes file_get_contents('file:///etc/passwd'), writes the content to a temp file, and attaches it as an inline MIME part.

Impact

An authenticated attacker can read arbitrary files accessible by the web server process, including /etc/passwd, application configuration files containing database credentials, private TLS keys, and environment files.

Remediation

Enforce a strict URI scheme allowlist before calling file_get_contents(). Replace the check
!str_starts_with($myUrl, 'http') with if (!preg_match('#^https?://#i', $myUrl)) { continue; } to reject file://, ftp://, php://, data://`, and any other non-HTTP scheme.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMlow confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.the CNA's CVSS · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 7, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45016(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
egroupware/egroupware14.2.20150121 ... 23.1.20260224 (185 versions)
  • 26.0.20251208 up to 26.5.20260507: fixed in 26.5.20260507
  • every version up to 23.1.20260601: fixed in 23.1.20260601
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-25 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-18 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-30 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-26 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-07 13:38 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-45016?
CVE-2026-45016 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 7, 2026. EGroupware Vulnerable to Local File Inclusion via file:// URI in Mail Compose Summary The function processes image URLs embedded in an HTML email body without validating or restricting URI schemes. The check !strstartswith($myUrl, 'http') evaluates to true for file:// URIs, causing…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45016 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-45016 was published on July 7, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 7, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45016?
CVE-2026-45016 has a CVSS base score of 6.5 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45016?
A fix for CVE-2026-45016 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-45016 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45016

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45016?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.