rabbitmq-c is a C-language AMQP client library for RabbitMQ. Prior to 0.16.0, a malicious AMQP server can send an undersized HEADER or METHOD frame during client login and cause unsigned size_t underflow in amqp_handle_input() in librabbitmq/amqp_connection.c. The parser subtracts HEADER_SIZE, fixed per-frame fields, and FOOTER_SIZE from state->target_size without first checking the minimum frame length. The wrapped encoded.len value is passed through amqp_decode_properties() to amqp_decode_table_internal(), where it defeats bounds checks and causes an out-of-bounds read and process crash. An on-path attacker can also trigger the issue when AMQP traffic is not protected by TLS with certificate validation. The demonstrated impact is denial of service, with no reliable memory disclosure or code execution shown. This issue is fixed in version 0.16.0.
CVE-2026-44235
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 71% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 17, 2026
Last Modified
September 17, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026rabbitmq-c v0.16.0
Patch available: alanxz/rabbitmq-c v0.16.0
https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/releases/tag/v0.16.0commit 1d3afbb056fe (alanxz/rabbitmq-c)
Patch available: alanxz/rabbitmq-c v0.16.0 (contains commit 1d3afbb056fe)
https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/commit/1d3afbb056fee5cc9ea05680bf32288715d0d802amqp_connection: reject undersized frames in amqp_handle_input (GHSA-9mmv-r8g3-qp46)
Patch available: alanxz/rabbitmq-c v0.16.0 (PR #878 merged 2026-06-08)
https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/pull/878size_t underflow in AMQP frame length computation leads to out-of-bounds read in rabbitmq-c · Advisory · alanxz/rabbitmq-c · GitHub
https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-9mmv-r8g3-qp46Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | librabbitmq4 (0.15.0-1ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | librabbitmq4 (0.10.0-1ubuntu2.2) @ jammy | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 17:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu
- CVE-2004-0989EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-0990EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-1010EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-0941EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0981EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-0882EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0888EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-1012EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-1013EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-1018EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-125 · CWE-191
- CVE-2013-0767EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2009-2523EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2007-0063EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2014-2898EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2897EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2896EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-0497EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2005-0199EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-1999-0006EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-1522EG 9.3EPSS p92HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-44235?
When was CVE-2026-44235 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-44235 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44235?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-44235?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-44235
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-44235?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.