CVE-2026-43499

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-21. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Elevated
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()

remove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for proxy-lock rollback in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() when invoked from futex_requeue().

In the latter case waiter::task is not current, but remove_waiter() operates on current for the dequeue operation. That results in several problems:

1) the rbtree dequeue happens without waiter::task::pi_lock being held

2) the waiter task's pi_blocked_on state is not cleared, which leaves a dangling pointer primed for UAF around.

3) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() operates on the wrong top priority waiter task

Use waiter::task instead of current in all related operations in remove_waiter() to cure those problems.

[ tglx: Fixup rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(), add a comment and amend the changelog ]

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EPSS
2.6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 21, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8cce4773c2b23d819baf5abedc62f7b430e8745
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a1fc8d698ac5e5916e3082a0f74450d71f9611f
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88614876370aac8ad1050ad785a4c095ba17ac11
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d52dfcb2a5db86e346cf51f8fcf2071b8085166
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fb7394a837740770f0d6b4b30567e60786a63f2
generic

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bfdc63936dd4773109b7b8c280c0f3b5ae7d349

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 64× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 173 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-29 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-06-29 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-28 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-06-28 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-27 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-27 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-06-27 07:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-27 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-06-27 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-26 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-26 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-06-26 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-06-26 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-26 03:38 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-06-26 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-25 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-25 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-06-25 14:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-17 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-17 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-06-17 22:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-17 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-17 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-16 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-16 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-06-16 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-16 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-06-16 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-15 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-06-15 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-14 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-14 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-06-14 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-14 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-14 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-06-14 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-06-14 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-14 01:09 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-06-14 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-06-13 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-06-13 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-13 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-13 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-12 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-06-12 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-06-12 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-06-12 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-06-12 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-06-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-06-11 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-06-11 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-11 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-11 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-06-11 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-10 17:37 UTCEG score recompute

Publicly available exploits

(10 references)

Working exploit code is in the public domain (10 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • GitHub PoCLinuxoid-cn/CVE-2026-43499-Poc-Analysis
    First seen Jul 14, 2026

    Vulnerability analysis and Proof of Concept (PoC) for CVE-2026-43499 affecting Xiaomi devices. For educational and research purposes only.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjoehquak/Mi8E5-Unlocker-by-CVE-2026-43499
    First seen Jul 13, 2026

    Multi OS Support: Version for MacOS/Linux and Windows, Fully translated to English

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCYakayna/SpringPeace
    First seen Jul 13, 2026

    (Hopefully) A tool to root for (most) Android devices through CVE-2026-43499

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCJoinChang/ghostlock-oneplus
    First seen Jul 12, 2026

    GhostLock (CVE-2026-43499) kernel exploit for OnePlus devices with locked bootloader

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCLinuxoid-cn/Mi8E5-Unlocker-by-CVE-2026-43499
    First seen Jul 12, 2026

    基于 CVE-2026-43499 的 8E5 机型自动化解锁辅助工具,仅限授权安全研究与自有设备使用。

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCx-spy/CVE-2026-43499-popsicle
    First seen Jul 12, 2026

    CVE-2026-43499 Implementation for 6.12.23-android16-5-g75e9b1c7ae7c-abogki463945075-4k

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCpubglite55/oppo-ghostlock
    First seen Jul 9, 2026

    OPPO Find N2 GhostLock (CVE-2026-43499) exploit adaptation

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCtc3650/CVE-2026-43499-armv7
    First seen Jul 9, 2026
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xBlackash/CVE-2026-43499
    First seen Jul 8, 2026

    CVE-2026-43499

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCMobiusM/CVE-2026-43499
    First seen Jun 27, 2026

    CVE-2026-43499 PoC

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43499?
CVE-2026-43499 is a high vulnerability published on May 21, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter() remove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for proxy-lock rollback in rtmutexstartproxylock() when invoked from futex_requeue(). In the latter…
When was CVE-2026-43499 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43499 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 21, 2026, with the most recent update on July 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43499 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43499 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.6% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43499?
CVE-2026-43499 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43499?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43499, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43499

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43499?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.