CVE-2026-43489

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status

LUO keeps track of successful retrieve attempts on a LUO file. It does so to avoid multiple retrievals of the same file. Multiple retrievals cause problems because once the file is retrieved, the serialized data structures are likely freed and the file is likely in a very different state from what the code expects.

The retrieve boolean in struct luo_file keeps track of this, and is passed to the finish callback so it knows what work was already done and what it has left to do.

All this works well when retrieve succeeds. When it fails, luo_retrieve_file() returns the error immediately, without ever storing anywhere that a retrieve was attempted or what its error code was. This results in an errored LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD ioctl to userspace, but nothing prevents it from trying this again.

The retry is problematic for much of the same reasons listed above. The file is likely in a very different state than what the retrieve logic normally expects, and it might even have freed some serialization data structures. Attempting to access them or free them again is going to break things.

For example, if memfd managed to restore 8 of its 10 folios, but fails on the 9th, a subsequent retrieve attempt will try to call kho_restore_folio() on the first folio again, and that will fail with a warning since it is an invalid operation.

Apart from the retry, finish() also breaks. Since on failure the retrieved bool in luo_file is never touched, the finish() call on session close will tell the file handler that retrieve was never attempted, and it will try to access or free the data structures that might not exist, much in the same way as the retry attempt.

There is no sane way of attempting the retrieve again. Remember the error retrieve returned and directly return it on a retry. Also pass this status code to finish() so it can make the right decision on the work it needs to do.

This is done by changing the bool to an integer. A value of 0 means retrieve was never attempted, a positive value means it succeeded, and a negative value means it failed and the error code is the value.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 13, 2026

Last Modified

June 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f85b1c6af5bc3872f994df0a5688c1162de07a62
generic

liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d3ad69484dc1cc53be62d2554e7ef038a627af9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43489(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.19.9osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 02:59 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 22:29 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  24. 2026-06-29 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-26 19:41 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  4. 2026-06-25 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-17 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-14 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-07 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-04 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-01 06:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-21 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-20 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-05-20 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43489?
CVE-2026-43489 is a medium vulnerability published on May 13, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status LUO keeps track of successful retrieve attempts on a LUO file. It does so to avoid multiple retrievals of the same file. Multiple retrievals cause problems because once the file is…
When was CVE-2026-43489 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43489 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 13, 2026, with the most recent update on June 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43489 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43489 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43489?
CVE-2026-43489 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43489?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43489, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43489

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43489?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.