CVE-2026-43448

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-28754 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: <0.1%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable()

In the following scenario, pdev can be disabled between (1) and (3) by (2). This sets pdev->msix_enabled = 0. Then, pci_irq_vector() will return MSI-X IRQ(>15) for (1) whereas return INTx IRQ(<=15) for (2). This causes IRQ warning because it tries to enable INTx IRQ that has never been disabled before.

To fix this, save IRQ number into a local variable and ensure disable_irq() and enable_irq() operate on the same IRQ number. Even if pci_free_irq_vectors() frees the IRQ concurrently, disable_irq() and enable_irq() on a stale IRQ number is still valid and safe, and the depth accounting reamins balanced.

task 1: nvme_poll_irqdisable() disable_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, nvmeq->cq_vector)) ...(1) enable_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, nvmeq->cq_vector)) ...(3)

task 2: nvme_reset_work() nvme_dev_disable() pdev->msix_enable = 0; ...(2)

crash log:

------------[ cut here ]------------ Unbalanced enable for IRQ 10 WARNING: kernel/irq/manage.c:753 at __enable_irq+0x102/0x190 kernel/irq/manage.c:753, CPU#1: kworker/1:0H/26 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: kworker/1:0H Not tainted 6.19.0-dirty #9 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_timeout_work RIP: 0010:__enable_irq+0x107/0x190 kernel/irq/manage.c:753 Code: ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 0f b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 04 84 d2 75 79 48 8d 3d 2e 7a 3f 05 41 8b 74 24 2c <67> 48 0f b9 3a e8 ef b9 21 00 5b 41 5c 5d e9 46 54 66 03 e8 e1 b9 RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bf550 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000007 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffffb20c0e90 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000a RDI: ffffffffb74b88f0 RBP: ffffc900001bf560 R08: ffff88800197cf00 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff8880012a6000 R13: 1ffff92000037eae R14: 000000000000000a R15: 0000000000000293 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b49f7000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000555da4a25fa8 CR3: 00000000208e8000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: enable_irq+0x121/0x1e0 kernel/irq/manage.c:797 nvme_poll_irqdisable+0x162/0x1c0 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:1494 nvme_timeout+0x965/0x14b0 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:1744 blk_mq_rq_timed_out block/blk-mq.c:1653 [inline] blk_mq_handle_expired+0x227/0x2d0 block/blk-mq.c:1721 bt_iter+0x2fc/0x3a0 block/blk-mq-tag.c:292 __sbitmap_for_each_set include/linux/sbitmap.h:269 [inline] sbitmap_for_each_set include/linux/sbitmap.h:290 [inline] bt_for_each block/blk-mq-tag.c:324 [inline] blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x969/0x1e80 block/blk-mq-tag.c:536 blk_mq_timeout_work+0x627/0x870 block/blk-mq.c:1763 process_one_work+0x956/0x1aa0 kernel/workqueue.c:3257 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3340 [inline] worker_thread+0x65c/0xe60 kernel/workqueue.c:3421 kthread+0x41a/0x930 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x6f8/0x8c0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:246 irq event stamp: 74478 hardirqs last enabled at (74477): [] __raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 [inline] hardirqs last enabled at (74477): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2c/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202 hardirqs last disabled at (74478): [] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline] hardirqs last disabled at (74478): [] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x85/0xa0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 softirqs last enabled at (74304): [] __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (74304): [] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:496 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (74304): [] __irq_exit_rcu+0xdc/0x120 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation<0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
<0.1%
EPSS %ILE
below the 1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
<0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

May 21, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jun 16, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc71f409b22ca831a9f87a2712eaa09ef2bb4a5e
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e311d84c62eb76e025e11a44155b402e55950b83
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b56c49897bdac5cb49e3495ef421c391628ee9bb
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/843e913cef4e33723663a899727f685a95ab53fe
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/628773eba024d1107cc9ec157a682cbb42ac912a
Web page

nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvme_poll_irqdisable() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/265dbc9bc33c29f60f90be3e0afe1c4067ebb70b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43448(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.170-1: fixed in 6.1.170-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (123 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.10-1: fixed in 6.19.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 212 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 112 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-23 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  7. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  5. 2026-09-30 07:58 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  7. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  10. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  11. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-09-11 14:23 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  16. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  17. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  26. 2026-08-23 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-23 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-23 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  29. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  30. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  31. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  32. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  34. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-08-17 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-17 11:31 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-17 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  38. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  39. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-16 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  42. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  43. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-08-14 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-14 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-14 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  47. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  48. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  51. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  52. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  53. 2026-08-11 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-11 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-11 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  56. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  57. 2026-08-10 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-10 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  59. 2026-08-09 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-09 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-09 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  62. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  63. 2026-08-08 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-08 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-08 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  66. 2026-08-07 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-07 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-07 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  69. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  70. 2026-08-05 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-05 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-05 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-938f-6jj9-x227 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  73. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  74. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  75. 2026-08-04 03:00 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43448?
CVE-2026-43448 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-pci: Fix race bug in nvmepollirqdisable() In the following scenario, pdev can be disabled between (1) and (3) by (2). This sets pdev->msixenabled = 0. Then, pciirq_vector() will return MSI-X IRQ(>15) for (1) whereas return…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43448 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43448 was published on May 8, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43448 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43448 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a <0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43448?
CVE-2026-43448 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43448?
A fix for CVE-2026-43448 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43448 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43448

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43448?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.