CVE-2026-43361

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes

Currently a user can trigger a transaction abort by snapshotting a previously received snapshot a bunch of times until we reach a BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL item overflow (the maximum item size we can store in a leaf). This is very likely not common in practice, but if it happens, it turns the filesystem into RO mode. The snapshot, send and set_received_subvol and subvol_setflags (used by receive) don't require CAP_SYS_ADMIN, just inode_owner_or_capable(). A malicious user could use this to turn a filesystem into RO mode and disrupt a system.

Reproducer script:

$ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash

DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi

# Use smallest node size to make the test faster. mkfs.btrfs -f --nodesize 4K $DEV mount $DEV $MNT

# Create a subvolume and set it to RO so that it can be used for send. btrfs subvolume create $MNT/sv touch $MNT/sv/foo btrfs property set $MNT/sv ro true

# Send and receive the subvolume into snaps/sv. mkdir $MNT/snaps btrfs send $MNT/sv | btrfs receive $MNT/snaps

# Now snapshot the received subvolume, which has a received_uuid, a # lot of times to trigger the leaf overflow. total=500 for ((i = 1; i <= $total; i++)); do echo -ne "\rCreating snapshot $i/$total" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/snaps/sv $MNT/snaps/sv_$i > /dev/null done echo

umount $MNT

When running the test:

$ ./test.sh (...) Create subvolume '/mnt/sdi/sv' At subvol /mnt/sdi/sv At subvol sv Creating snapshot 496/500ERROR: Could not create subvolume: Value too large for defined data type Creating snapshot 497/500ERROR: Could not create subvolume: Read-only file system Creating snapshot 498/500ERROR: Could not create subvolume: Read-only file system Creating snapshot 499/500ERROR: Could not create subvolume: Read-only file system Creating snapshot 500/500ERROR: Could not create subvolume: Read-only file system

And in dmesg/syslog:

$ dmesg (...) [251067.627338] BTRFS warning (device sdi): insert uuid item failed -75 (0x4628b21c4ac8d898, 0x2598bee2b1515c91) type 252! [251067.629212] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [251067.630033] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -75) [251067.630871] WARNING: fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1907 at create_pending_snapshot.cold+0x52/0x465 [btrfs], CPU#10: btrfs/615235 [251067.632851] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_zero (...) [251067.644071] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 615235 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 6.19.0-rc8-btrfs-next-225+ #1 PREEMPT(full) [251067.646165] Tainted: [W]=WARN [251067.646733] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [251067.648735] RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot.cold+0x55/0x465 [btrfs] [251067.649984] Code: f0 48 0f (...) [251067.653313] RSP: 0018:ffffce644908fae8 EFLAGS: 00010292 [251067.653987] RAX: 00000000ffffff01 RBX: ffff8e5639e63a80 RCX: 00000000ffffffd3 [251067.655042] RDX: ffff8e53faa76b00 RSI: 00000000ffffffb5 RDI: ffffffffc0919750 [251067.656077] RBP: ffffce644908fbd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffce644908f820 [251067.657068] R10: ffff8e5adc1fffa8 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff8e53c0431bd0 [251067.658050] R13: ffff8e5414593600 R14: ffff8e55efafd000 R15: 00000000ffffffb5 [251067.659019] FS: 00007f2a4944b3c0(0000) GS:ffff8e5b27dae000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [251067.660115] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [251067.660943] CR2: 00007ffc5aa57898 CR3: 00000005813a2003 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [251067.661972] Call Trace: [251067.662292] [251067.662653] create_pending_snapshots+0x97/0xc0 [btrfs] [251067.663413] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x26e/0xc00 [btrfs] [251067.664257] ? btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta+0x35/0x390 [btrfs] [251067.665238] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30 [251067.665837] ? record_root_ ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

May 15, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jun 15, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3d8efc157bc590457d3e31da403af1a221643d6
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1b18b959025e6b5dbad668f391f65d34b39595a
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bac55dde8efa457e769c934fd88a63f2141ba238
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a9227b488ffb7cdbb5d930a01fc6956c05ba61a
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/770af8e465c2c3de528f85e840eab462dd41542b
generic

btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6bce705b699cba9afccb996c77d194fe003dfa2a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43361(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)6.1.170-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (119 versions)6.19.10-1

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 180 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-23 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 19:12 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 19:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 11:53 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-17 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-17 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-16 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-16 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-15 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-15 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-14 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-14 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-12 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-12 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-12 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-11 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-11 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-11 01:18 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-11 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-10 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-10 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-10 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-09 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-09 02:25 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-09 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-07 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-07 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-07 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-06 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-06 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-06 20:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-05 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-05 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-05 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-03 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-03 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-03 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-03 01:07 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-03 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-02 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-02 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-02 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-16 05:23 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43361?
CVE-2026-43361 is a medium vulnerability published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix transaction abort when snapshotting received subvolumes Currently a user can trigger a transaction abort by snapshotting a previously received snapshot a bunch of times until we reach a BTRFSUUIDKEYRECEIVEDSUBVOL item…
When was CVE-2026-43361 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43361 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 8, 2026, with the most recent update on May 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43361 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43361 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43361?
CVE-2026-43361 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43361?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43361, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43361

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43361?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.