CVE-2026-43252

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-27811 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: <0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp

Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning:

WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 at __mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 [inline], CPU#1: syz.7.48/2535 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 at mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1446 [inline], CPU#1: syz.7.48/2535 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 at mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags_all net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1474 [inline], CPU#1: syz.7.48/2535 WARNING: net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 at mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags+0x5de/0x640 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1538, CPU#1: syz.7.48/2535 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2535 Comm: syz.7.48 Not tainted 6.18.0-03987-gea5f5e676cf5 #17 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1074 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1446 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags_all net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1474 [inline] RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags+0x5de/0x640 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1538 Code: 89 c7 e8 c5 8c 73 fe e9 f7 fd ff ff 49 83 ef 80 e8 b7 8c 73 fe 4c 89 ff be 03 00 00 00 e8 4a 29 e3 fe eb ac e8 a3 8c 73 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 3d ff ff ff e8 95 8c 73 fe b8 a1 ff ff ff eb 1a e8 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc9001535b820 EFLAGS: 00010287 netdevsim0: tun_chr_ioctl cmd 1074025677 RAX: ffffffff82da294d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000080000 RDX: ffffc900096d0000 RSI: 00000000000006d6 RDI: 00000000000006d7 netdevsim0: linktype set to 823 RBP: ffff88802cdb2240 R08: 00000000000104ae R09: ffffffffffffffff R10: ffffffff82da27d4 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88801246d8c0 R14: ffffc9001535b8b8 R15: ffff88802cdb1800 FS: 00007fc6ac5a76c0(0000) GS:ffff8880f90c8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 netlink: 'syz.3.50': attribute type 5 has an invalid length. CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 netlink: 1232 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.3.50'. CR2: 0000200000010000 CR3: 0000000025b1a000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: mptcp_pm_set_flags net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:277 [inline] mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags_doit+0x1d7/0x210 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:282 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x117/0x180 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x3a8/0x3f0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210 netlink_rcv_skb+0x16d/0x240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550 genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1318 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x3e9/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344 netlink_sendmsg+0x4ab/0x5b0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xc9/0xf0 net/socket.c:733 ____sys_sendmsg+0x272/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2608 ___sys_sendmsg+0x2de/0x320 net/socket.c:2662 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2694 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2699 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2697 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2697 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xed/0x360 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fc6adb66f6d Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fc6ac5a6ff8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc6addf5fa0 RCX: 00007fc6adb66f6d RDX: 0000000000048084 RSI: 00002000000002c0 RDI: 000000000000000e RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
<0.1%
EPSS %ILE
below the 1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
<0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 11, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d90d73ad183566c81320d453a223f610a280f210
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d191101dee25567c2af3b28565f45346c33d65f5
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e4d88e36e5d0b8ffda637999cbca64c81701a81
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c1d221e475e3d8eb8ed4702392d43f8c5134d1f
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d480efd98e290c445f4ba476e4dcda5624b1aab
Web page

mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b3ff4d88b508b73e2bbddb59356311efb7ba192

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.170-1: fixed in 6.1.170-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (117 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.6-1: fixed in 6.19.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 215 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-23 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-23 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-09-30 09:41 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  16. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  17. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-09-11 16:23 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  26. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  27. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  28. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  29. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  30. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  31. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  32. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  33. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  34. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  36. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  37. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  40. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  41. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  42. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  43. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  45. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  46. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  49. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  50. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  53. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  54. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  56. 2026-08-12 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-12 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  58. 2026-08-12 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-12 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-12 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  61. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  62. 2026-08-11 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-11 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-11 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  65. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  66. 2026-08-10 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-10 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  68. 2026-08-09 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-09 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-09 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  71. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  72. 2026-08-07 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-07 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h3c3-pp9v-wf35 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  74. 2026-08-06 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-06 21:27 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43252?
CVE-2026-43252 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: always set ID as avail when rm endp Syzkaller managed to find a combination of actions that was generating this warning: WARNING: net/mptcp/pmkernel.c:1074 at marksubflowendpavailable…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43252 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43252 was published on May 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43252 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43252 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a <0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43252?
CVE-2026-43252 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43252?
A fix for CVE-2026-43252 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43252

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43252?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.