CVE-2026-43244

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error

Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list.

When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments:

head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+

For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits:

WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags)

TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup.

Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us.

Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly.

There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1].

[1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
2.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 11, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 11, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca220141fa8ebae09765a242076b2b77338106b0
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1e3edf688a88c1a3ac41657055d9c136a08cd25
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ea3671d70ee07480d80bebe86696397c4e99fb7
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7af58f76e4b404a74c836881a845e6652db8a09f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43244(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-14 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-14 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-12 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-12 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-11 06:59 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-11 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-10 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-10 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-09 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-09 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-07 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-07 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-06 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-06 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-05 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-05 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-06-04 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-04 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-03 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-03 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-02 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-02 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-01 09:31 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-01 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-21 22:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-20 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-05-20 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 is a medium vulnerability published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcmwritemsgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcmsendmsg() fills MAXSKB_FRAGS fragments in the…
When was CVE-2026-43244 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43244 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 6, 2026, with the most recent update on May 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43244 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43244 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43244?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43244, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43244

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43244?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.