CVE-2026-43161

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-27722 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode

PCIe endpoints with ATS enabled and passed through to userspace (e.g., QEMU, DPDK) can hard-lock the host when their link drops, either by surprise removal or by a link fault.

Commit 4fc82cd907ac ("iommu/vt-d: Don't issue ATS Invalidation request when device is disconnected") adds pci_dev_is_disconnected() to devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid() so ATS invalidation is skipped only when the device is being safely removed, but it applies only when Intel IOMMU scalable mode is enabled.

With scalable mode disabled or unsupported, a system hard-lock occurs when a PCIe endpoint's link drops because the Intel IOMMU waits indefinitely for an ATS invalidation that cannot complete.

Call Trace: qi_submit_sync qi_flush_dev_iotlb __context_flush_dev_iotlb.part.0 domain_context_clear_one_cb pci_for_each_dma_alias device_block_translation blocking_domain_attach_dev iommu_deinit_device __iommu_group_remove_device iommu_release_device iommu_bus_notifier blocking_notifier_call_chain bus_notify device_del pci_remove_bus_device pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist

Commit 81e921fd3216 ("iommu/vt-d: Fix NULL domain on device release") adds intel_pasid_teardown_sm_context() to intel_iommu_release_device(), which calls qi_flush_dev_iotlb() and can also hard-lock the system when a PCIe endpoint's link drops.

Call Trace: qi_submit_sync qi_flush_dev_iotlb __context_flush_dev_iotlb.part.0 intel_context_flush_no_pasid device_pasid_table_teardown pci_pasid_table_teardown pci_for_each_dma_alias intel_pasid_teardown_sm_context intel_iommu_release_device iommu_deinit_device __iommu_group_remove_device iommu_release_device iommu_bus_notifier blocking_notifier_call_chain bus_notify device_del pci_remove_bus_device pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist

Sometimes the endpoint loses connection without a link-down event (e.g., due to a link fault); killing the process (virsh destroy) then hard-locks the host.

Call Trace: qi_submit_sync qi_flush_dev_iotlb __context_flush_dev_iotlb.part.0 domain_context_clear_one_cb pci_for_each_dma_alias device_block_translation blocking_domain_attach_dev __iommu_attach_device __iommu_device_set_domain __iommu_group_set_domain_internal iommu_detach_group vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group vfio_group_detach_container vfio_group_fops_release __fput

pci_dev_is_disconnected() only covers safe-removal paths; pci_device_is_present() tests accessibility by reading vendor/device IDs and internally calls pci_dev_is_disconnected(). On a ConnectX-5 (8 GT/s, x2) this costs ~70 µs.

Since __context_flush_dev_iotlb() is only called on {attach,release}_dev paths (not hot), add pci_device_is_present() there to skip inaccessible devices and avoid the hard-lock.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e70d5feb10c5ba2bbf7ca400b8f39a2f82d653e8
Web page

iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc0490ad9edf5c6f98e39fbbee2877b85261a5ae
Web page

iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48b3f08e68b29a79527869cdde7298ca2a9b9646
Web page

iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42662d19839f34735b718129ea200e3734b07e50

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43161(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.77 (fixes >=5.14.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (117 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.6-1: fixed in 6.19.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 233 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 133 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  4. 2026-11-06 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-06 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  7. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 17:25 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  23. 2026-10-23 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-23 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-23 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-30 09:41 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  31. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 16:23 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  43. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  45. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  46. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  53. 2026-08-23 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-23 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  55. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  59. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-08-17 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-17 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  63. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  64. 2026-08-16 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-16 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-15 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  69. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-08-14 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-14 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  72. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-12 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-12 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jph2-qvw9-vvwq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  75. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43161?
CVE-2026-43161 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode PCIe endpoints with ATS enabled and passed through to userspace (e.g., QEMU, DPDK) can hard-lock the host when their link drops, either by surprise…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43161 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43161 was published on May 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43161 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43161 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43161?
CVE-2026-43161 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43161?
A fix for CVE-2026-43161 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43161 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43161

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43161?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.