CVE-2026-43118

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay

When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0. This is to signal during log replay (in overwrite_item()), that we should not set the i_size since we only logged that an inode exists, so the i_size of the inode in the subvolume tree must be preserved (as when we log new names or that an inode exists, we don't log extents).

This works fine except when we have already logged an inode in full mode or it's the first time we are logging an inode created in a past transaction, that inode has a new i_size of 0 and then we log a new name for the inode (due to a new hardlink or a rename), in which case we log an i_size of 0 for the inode and a generation of 0, which causes the log replay code to not update the inode's i_size to 0 (in overwrite_item()).

An example scenario:

mkdir /mnt/dir xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64K" /mnt/dir/foo

sync

xfs_io -c "truncate 0" -c "fsync" /mnt/dir/foo

ln /mnt/dir/foo /mnt/dir/bar

xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/dir

After log replay the file remains with a size of 64K. This is because when we first log the inode, when we fsync file foo, we log its current i_size of 0, and then when we create a hard link we log again the inode in exists mode (LOG_INODE_EXISTS) but we set a generation of 0 for the inode item we add to the log tree, so during log replay overwrite_item() sees that the generation is 0 and i_size is 0 so we skip updating the inode's i_size from 64K to 0.

Fix this by making sure at fill_inode_item() we always log the real generation of the inode if it was logged in the current transaction with the i_size we logged before. Also if an inode created in a previous transaction is logged in exists mode only, make sure we log the i_size stored in the inode item located from the commit root, so that if we log multiple times that the inode exists we get the correct i_size.

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
1.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 8, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43118(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-14 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-14 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-13 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-13 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-12 02:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-12 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-11 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-11 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-10 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-10 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-09 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-09 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-08 04:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-08 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-07 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-07 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-06 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-05 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-04 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-04 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-03 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-06-03 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-02 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-02 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-01 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-01 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-20 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-05-20 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43118?
CVE-2026-43118 is a medium vulnerability published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0.…
When was CVE-2026-43118 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43118 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 6, 2026, with the most recent update on May 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43118 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43118 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43118?
CVE-2026-43118 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43118?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43118, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43118

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43118?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.