CVE-2026-43118

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay

When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0. This is to signal during log replay (in overwrite_item()), that we should not set the i_size since we only logged that an inode exists, so the i_size of the inode in the subvolume tree must be preserved (as when we log new names or that an inode exists, we don't log extents).

This works fine except when we have already logged an inode in full mode or it's the first time we are logging an inode created in a past transaction, that inode has a new i_size of 0 and then we log a new name for the inode (due to a new hardlink or a rename), in which case we log an i_size of 0 for the inode and a generation of 0, which causes the log replay code to not update the inode's i_size to 0 (in overwrite_item()).

An example scenario:

mkdir /mnt/dir xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64K" /mnt/dir/foo

sync

xfs_io -c "truncate 0" -c "fsync" /mnt/dir/foo

ln /mnt/dir/foo /mnt/dir/bar

xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/dir

After log replay the file remains with a size of 64K. This is because when we first log the inode, when we fsync file foo, we log its current i_size of 0, and then when we create a hard link we log again the inode in exists mode (LOG_INODE_EXISTS) but we set a generation of 0 for the inode item we add to the log tree, so during log replay overwrite_item() sees that the generation is 0 and i_size is 0 so we skip updating the inode's i_size from 64K to 0.

Fix this by making sure at fill_inode_item() we always log the real generation of the inode if it was logged in the current transaction with the i_size we logged before. Also if an inode created in a previous transaction is logged in exists mode only, make sure we log the i_size stored in the inode item located from the commit root, so that if we log multiple times that the inode exists we get the correct i_size.

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 8, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fddb157536e67a055597f00a8b4922d5f5ed0826
generic

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5254d4181add9dfaa5e3519edd71cc8f752b2f85
generic

btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03e966b63df5b06790310c1faaf3e0cb43adea8b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43118(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.18.24osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (160 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (126 versions)6.19.14-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 157 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-23 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-17 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 04:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-16 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-14 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-14 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-13 00:10 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-13 00:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-12 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-12 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-11 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-11 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-10 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-10 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-09 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-09 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-07 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-07 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-06 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-05 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-05 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-04 04:00 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-04 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-03 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-02 05:10 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-02 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-23 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-19 18:18 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43118?
CVE-2026-43118 is a medium vulnerability published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix zero size inode with non-zero size after log replay When logging that an inode exists, as part of logging a new name or logging new dir entries for a directory, we always set the generation of the logged inode item to 0.…
When was CVE-2026-43118 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43118 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 6, 2026, with the most recent update on May 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43118 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43118 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43118?
CVE-2026-43118 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43118?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43118, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43118

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43118?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.