CVE-2026-43065

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-05. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4_mb_release()

While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]:

> If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, > deleting files will populate sbi->s_discard_list and queue > s_discard_work. If it is then remounted with nodiscard, the > EXT4_MOUNT_DISCARD flag is cleared, but the pending s_discard_work is > neither cancelled nor flushed.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang%40linux.dev

The concern was valid, but it had nothing to do with the patch[1]. One of the problems with Sashiko in its current (early) form is that it will detect pre-existing issues and report it as a problem with the patch that it is reviewing.

In practice, it would be hard to hit deliberately (unless you are a malicious syzkaller fuzzer), since it would involve mounting the file system with -o discard, and then deleting a large number of files, remounting the file system with -o nodiscard, and then immediately unmounting the file system before the queued discard work has a change to drain on its own.

Fix it because it's a real bug, and to avoid Sashiko from raising this concern when analyzing future patches to mballoc.c.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 5, 2026

Last Modified

May 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43065(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.203osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 18:18 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-14 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-13 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-12 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-11 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-09 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-08 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-07 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-06 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-04 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-06-03 08:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-02 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-01 09:50 UTCEG score recompute 5.50
  51. 2026-06-01 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-20 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-05-20 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43065?
CVE-2026-43065 is a medium vulnerability published on May 5, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: always drain queued discard work in ext4mbrelease() While reviewing recent ext4 patch[1], Sashiko raised the following concern[2]: If the filesystem is initially mounted with the discard option, deleting files will populate…
When was CVE-2026-43065 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43065 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 5, 2026, with the most recent update on May 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43065 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43065 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43065?
CVE-2026-43065 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43065?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43065, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-43065

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43065?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.