CVE-2026-43053

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-26652 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation

When inactivating an inode with node-format extended attributes, xfs_attr3_node_inactive() invalidates all child leaf/node blocks via xfs_trans_binval(), but intentionally does not remove the corresponding entries from their parent node blocks. The implicit assumption is that xfs_attr_inactive() will truncate the entire attr fork to zero extents afterwards, so log recovery will never reach the root node and follow those stale pointers.

However, if a log shutdown occurs after the leaf/node block cancellations commit but before the attr bmap truncation commits, this assumption breaks. Recovery replays the attr bmap intact (the inode still has attr fork extents), but suppresses replay of all cancelled leaf/node blocks, maybe leaving them as stale data on disk. On the next mount, xlog_recover_process_iunlinks() retries inactivation and attempts to read the root node via the attr bmap. If the root node was not replayed, reading the unreplayed root block triggers a metadata verification failure immediately; if it was replayed, following its child pointers to unreplayed child blocks triggers the same failure:

XFS (pmem0): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_da3_node_read_verify+0x53/0x220, xfs_da3_node block 0x78 XFS (pmem0): Unmount and run xfs_repair XFS (pmem0): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer: 00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ XFS (pmem0): metadata I/O error in "xfs_da_read_buf+0x104/0x190" at daddr 0x78 len 8 error 117

Fix this in two places:

In xfs_attr3_node_inactive(), after calling xfs_trans_binval() on a child block, immediately remove the entry that references it from the parent node in the same transaction. This eliminates the window where the parent holds a pointer to a cancelled block. Once all children are removed, the now-empty root node is converted to a leaf block within the same transaction. This node-to-leaf conversion is necessary for crash safety. If the system shutdown after the empty node is written to the log but before the second-phase bmap truncation commits, log recovery will attempt to verify the root block on disk. xfs_da3_node_verify() does not permit a node block with count == 0; such a block will fail verification and trigger a metadata corruption shutdown. on the other hand, leaf blocks are allowed to have this transient state.

In xfs_attr_inactive(), split the attr fork truncation into two explicit phases. First, truncate all extents beyond the root block (the child extents whose parent references have already been removed above). Second, invalidate the root block and truncate the attr bmap to zero in a single transaction. The two operations in the second phase must be atomic: as long as the attr bmap has any non-zero length, recovery can follow it to the root block, so the root block invalidation must commit together with the bmap-to-zero truncation.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 1, 2026

Last Modified

October 21, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5a3e3cdd9b3015ae79456c81beebfdbb5246c0f
Web page

xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b854e1c4eff3473b6d3a9ae74129ac5c48bc0b61

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43053(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.114 (fixes >=2.6.12)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.19.12 (fixes >=2.6.12)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (126 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.12-1: fixed in 6.19.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 150 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 52 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-29 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-21 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  14. 2026-10-21 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-21 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  16. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-21 12:29 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-21 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  19. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  16. 2026-09-30 11:47 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-09-11 18:23 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  26. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  27. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  28. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  29. 2026-08-23 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  30. 2026-08-17 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  31. 2026-08-16 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-16 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  33. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  34. 2026-08-14 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  35. 2026-08-13 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  36. 2026-08-12 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  37. 2026-08-11 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-11 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  39. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  40. 2026-08-10 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-10 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  42. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  43. 2026-08-09 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-09 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  45. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  46. 2026-08-08 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-08 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  48. 2026-08-07 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-07 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  50. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  51. 2026-08-05 22:35 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-05 22:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  53. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  54. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  55. 2026-08-03 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  56. 2026-08-02 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-02 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-37p6-c4xv-cq5q · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  58. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  59. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  60. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  61. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  62. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  63. 2026-07-23 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  65. 2026-07-19 19:18 UTCOSV refresh
  66. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  67. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  68. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  69. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  70. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  71. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  72. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  73. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43053?
CVE-2026-43053 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation When inactivating an inode with node-format extended attributes, xfsattr3node_inactive() invalidates all child leaf/node blocks via xfstransbinval(), but intentionally does not…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43053 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43053 was published on May 1, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43053 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43053 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43053?
CVE-2026-43053 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43053?
A fix for CVE-2026-43053 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43053 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43053

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43053?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.