CVE-2026-42812

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 66% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
9.9
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read.

write.metadata.path is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a Polaris-managed catalog, changing only that property through an ALTER TABLE-style settings change (not a row-level INSERT, SELECT, UPDATE, or DELETE) bypasses the commit-time branch that is supposed to revalidate storage locations.

The full persisted / credential-vending variant requires the affected catalog to have polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=true, with allowedLocations broad enough to include the attacker-chosen target.

allowedLocations is the admin-configured allowlist of storage paths that the catalog is allowed to use. Public project materials suggest that this flag is a real supported compatibility / layout mode, not just a contrived lab-only prerequisite.

In that configuration, a user who can change table settings can cause Apache Polaris itself to write new table metadata to an attacker-chosen reachable storage location before the intended location-validation branch runs.

If the later concrete-path validation also accepts that location, Polaris persists the resulting metadata path into stored table state. Later table-load and credential APIs can then return temporary cloud-storage credentials for the same location without revalidating it. In plain terms, Polaris can later hand out temporary storage access for the same attacker-chosen area.

That attacker-chosen area does not need to be limited to the poisoned table's own files. If it is a broader storage prefix, another table's prefix, or, depending on configuration or provider behavior, even a bucket/container root, the resulting disclosure or corruption scope can extend to any data and metadata Polaris can reach there.

The practical consequences are therefore similar to the staged-create credential-vending issue already discussed: data and metadata reachable in that storage scope can be exposed and, if write-capable credentials are later issued, modified, corrupted, or removed. Even before that later credential step, Polaris itself performs the metadata write to the unchecked location.

So the core issue is not only later credential vending.

The primary defect is that Polaris skips its intended location checks before performing a security- sensitive metadata write when only write.metadata.path changes.

When polaris.config.allow.unstructured.table.location=false, current code review suggests the later updateTableLike(...) validation usually rejects out-of-tree metadata locations before the unsafe path is persisted. That may reduce the persisted / credential-vending variant, but it does not prevent the underlying defect: Polaris still skips the intended pre-write location check when only write.metadata.path changes.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9(medium)
EPSS
28.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 4, 2026

Last Modified

May 12, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 12, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

oss-security - CVE-2026-42812: Apache Polaris: No protection on `write.metadata.path`

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/02/13

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
org.apache.polaris:polaris-runtime-service1.0.0-incubating ... 1.4.0 (6 versions)1.4.1

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 155 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-15 04:30 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-15 00:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-14 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-14 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-14 12:07 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-14 08:09 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-12 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-12 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-12 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-11 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-11 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-11 11:02 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-11 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-11 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-10 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-10 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-10 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-10 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-09 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-09 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-09 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-09 10:58 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-09 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-09 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-08 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-08 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 10:47 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-06-08 06:48 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-08 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-07 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-07 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-06-07 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-07 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-06-07 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-06 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-06-06 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-06-06 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-06-06 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-06-06 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-05 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-05 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-06-05 10:02 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 05:58 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-05 01:59 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42812?
CVE-2026-42812 is a critical vulnerability published on May 4, 2026. In Apache Iceberg, the table's metadata files are control files: they tell readers which data files belong to the table and which table version to read. write.metadata.path is an optional table property that tells Polaris where to write those metadata files. For a table already registered in a…
When was CVE-2026-42812 disclosed?
CVE-2026-42812 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 4, 2026, with the most recent update on May 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-42812 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42812 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 28.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42812?
CVE-2026-42812 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42812?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-42812, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42812

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42812?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.