CVE-2026-41197

CRITICALNVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.0%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
9.3
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA instructions are processed block-by-block in BrilligBlock::compile_block(). When the compiler encounters an Instruction::Call with a Value::ForeignFunction target, it invokes codegen_call() in brillig_call/code_gen_call.rs, which dispatches to convert_ssa_foreign_call(). Before emitting the foreign call opcode, the compiler must pre-allocate memory for any array results the call will return. This happens through allocate_external_call_results(), which iterates over the result types. For Type::Array results, it delegates to allocate_foreign_call_result_array() to recursively allocate memory on the heap for nested arrays. The BrilligArray struct is the internal representation of a Noir array in Brillig IR. Its size field represents the semi-flattened size, the total number of memory slots the array occupies, accounting for the fact that composite types like tuples consume multiple slots per element. This size is computed by compute_array_length() in brillig_block_variables.rs. For the outer array, allocate_external_call_results() correctly uses define_variable(), which internally calls allocate_value_with_type(). This function applies the formula above, producing the correct semi-flattened size. However, for nested arrays, allocate_foreign_call_result_array() contains a bug. The pattern Type::Array(_, nested_size) discards the inner types with _ and uses only nested_size, the semantic length of the nested array (the number of logical elements), not the semi-flattened size. For simple element types this works correctly, but for composite element types it under-allocates. Foreign calls returning nested arrays of tuples or other composite types corrupt the Brillig VM heap. Version 1.0.0-beta.19 fixes this issue.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3(medium)
EPSS
31.6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 23, 2026

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Apr 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
github Patch Available

Heap corruption in foreign call results with nested tuple arrays · Advisory · noir-lang/noir · GitHub

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/security/advisories/GHSA-jj7c-x25r-r8r3
generic

Release v1.0.0-beta.19 · noir-lang/noir · GitHub

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/releases/tag/v1.0.0-beta.19

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
brillig1.0.0-beta.19

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 136 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-15 06:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-15 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-14 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-14 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-14 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-12 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-12 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-12 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-11 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-11 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-10 22:43 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-10 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-10 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-10 11:49 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-10 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-10 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-09 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-09 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-06-09 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-09 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-09 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-08 13:11 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-08 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-08 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-08 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-07 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-07 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-07 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-07 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-07 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-06-07 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-07 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-06 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-06 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-06 12:47 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-06-06 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-06 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-06-06 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-06-05 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-05 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-06-05 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-04 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-06-04 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-04 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-06-03 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-06-03 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-03 15:55 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 is a critical vulnerability published on April 23, 2026. Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA…
When was CVE-2026-41197 disclosed?
CVE-2026-41197 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 23, 2026, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-41197 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-41197 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 31.6% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41197?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-41197, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-41197

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41197?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.