CVE-2026-41197

CRITICALNVD 9.39.3—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 67% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA instructions are processed block-by-block in BrilligBlock::compile_block(). When the compiler encounters an Instruction::Call with a Value::ForeignFunction target, it invokes codegen_call() in brillig_call/code_gen_call.rs, which dispatches to convert_ssa_foreign_call(). Before emitting the foreign call opcode, the compiler must pre-allocate memory for any array results the call will return. This happens through allocate_external_call_results(), which iterates over the result types. For Type::Array results, it delegates to allocate_foreign_call_result_array() to recursively allocate memory on the heap for nested arrays. The BrilligArray struct is the internal representation of a Noir array in Brillig IR. Its size field represents the semi-flattened size, the total number of memory slots the array occupies, accounting for the fact that composite types like tuples consume multiple slots per element. This size is computed by compute_array_length() in brillig_block_variables.rs. For the outer array, allocate_external_call_results() correctly uses define_variable(), which internally calls allocate_value_with_type(). This function applies the formula above, producing the correct semi-flattened size. However, for nested arrays, allocate_foreign_call_result_array() contains a bug. The pattern Type::Array(_, nested_size) discards the inner types with _ and uses only nested_size, the semantic length of the nested array (the number of logical elements), not the semi-flattened size. For simple element types this works correctly, but for composite element types it under-allocates. Foreign calls returning nested arrays of tuples or other composite types corrupt the Brillig VM heap. Version 1.0.0-beta.19 fixes this issue.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 23, 2026

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 23, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github.
githubMentions a patch (unverified)

Heap corruption in foreign call results with nested tuple arrays · Advisory · noir-lang/noir · GitHub

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/security/advisories/GHSA-jj7c-x25r-r8r3
github_release Patch Available

v1.0.0-beta.19

Patch available: noir-lang/noir v1.0.0-beta.19

https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/releases/tag/v1.0.0-beta.19

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
brillig—
  • every version up to 1.0.0-beta.19: fixed in 1.0.0-beta.19
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 172 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-21 14:19 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-02 11:44 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-14 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-12 18:00 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-11 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-11 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-09 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-09 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-07 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-06 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-05 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-03 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-02 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-23 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-20 22:02 UTCOSV refresh
  62. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 is a critical vulnerability published on April 23, 2026. Noir is a Domain Specific Language for SNARK proving systems that is designed to use any ACIR compatible proving system, and Brillig is the bytecode ACIR uses for non-determinism. Noir programs can invoke external functions through foreign calls. When compiling to Brillig bytecode, the SSA…
When was CVE-2026-41197 disclosed?
CVE-2026-41197 was first published on April 23, 2026, with the most recent update on April 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-41197 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-41197 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41197?
CVE-2026-41197 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41197?
A fix for CVE-2026-41197 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-41197

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41197?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.