OAuth2 Proxy is a reverse proxy that provides authentication using OAuth2 providers. Versions 7.5.0 through 7.15.1 may trust a client-supplied X-Forwarded-Uri header when --reverse-proxy is enabled and --skip-auth-regex or --skip-auth-route is configured. An attacker can spoof this header so OAuth2 Proxy evaluates authentication and skip-auth rules against a different path than the one actually sent to the upstream application. This can result in an unauthenticated remote attacker bypassing authentication and accessing protected routes without a valid session. Impacted users are deployments that run oauth2-proxy with --reverse-proxy enabled and configure at least one --skip-auth-regex or --skip-auth-route rule. This issue is patched in v7.15.2. Some workarounds are available for those who cannot upgrade immediately. Strip any client-provided X-Forwarded-Uri header at the reverse proxy or load balancer level; explicitly overwrite X-Forwarded-Uri with the actual request URI before forwarding requests to OAuth2 Proxy; restrict direct client access to OAuth2 Proxy so it can only be reached through a trusted reverse proxy; and/or remove or narrow --skip-auth-regex / --skip-auth-route rules where possible. For nginx-based deployments, ensure X-Forwarded-Uri is set by nginx and not passed through from the client.
CVE-2026-40575
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-24557 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7x63-xv5r-3p2x (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 41st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 20262460449 – (CVE-2026-40575) CVE-2026-40575 oauth2-proxy: github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy: OAuth2 Proxy: Authentication bypass due to spoofed X-Forwarded-Uri header
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2460449CVE-2026-40575 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40575Authentication Bypass via X-Forwarded-Uri Header Spoofing · Advisory · oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy · GitHub
https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-7x63-xv5r-3p2xVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-40575(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | oauth2-proxy-main-7.15.4-0.1.hum1 | 2026-08-22 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy | — |
| — |
| github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 234 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 135 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-30 06:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-29 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-28 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-27 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-26 08:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-24 10:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-22 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 14:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 13:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 12:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 03:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-17 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-16 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-15 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 05:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-21 17:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7 · Go:github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-40575?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-40575 published?
Is CVE-2026-40575 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-40575?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-40575?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-40575
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-40575?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.