jq is a command-line JSON processor. Before commit 0c7d133c3c7e37c00b6d46b658a02244fdd3c784, jq used MurmurHash3 with a hardcoded, publicly visible seed (0x432A9843) for all JSON object hash table operations, which allowed an attacker to precompute key collisions offline. By supplying a crafted JSON object (~100 KB) where all keys hashed to the same bucket, hash table lookups degraded from O(1) to O(n), turning any jq expression into an O(n²) operation and causing significant CPU exhaustion. This affected common jq use cases such as CI/CD pipelines, web services, and data processing scripts, and was far more practical to exploit than existing heap overflow issues since it required only a small payload. This issue has been patched in commit 0c7d133c3c7e37c00b6d46b658a02244fdd3c784.
CVE-2026-40164
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.the CNA's CVSS · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 14, 2026
Last Modified
September 1, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jun 11, 2026Algorithmic complexity DoS via hardcoded MurmurHash3 seed · Advisory · jqlang/jq · GitHub
https://github.com/jqlang/jq/security/advisories/GHSA-wwj8-gxm6-jc29commit 0c7d133c3c7e (jqlang/jq)
Fix landed in jqlang/jq commit 0c7d133c3c7e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/jqlang/jq/commit/0c7d133c3c7e37c00b6d46b658a02244fdd3c784Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-40164(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:74674Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Base Images 3.4.3 (Neuron)
- RHSA-2026:34098Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.17.55 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:28887Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.14.68 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:30089Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3.5 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2026:30088Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3.5 (ROCm)
- RHSA-2026:30087Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3.5 (Spyre)
- RHSA-2026:30078Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server Model Optimization Tools 3.3.5 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2026:26542Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.13.68 bug fix and security update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(30)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | — |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | 1.6-2.1, 1.6-2.1+deb11u1 |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | 1.6-2.1, 1.6-2.1+deb12u1 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | 1.7.1-6+deb13u1 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| jq | 1.8.0-1, 1.8.1-1, 1.8.1-2, 1.8.1-3, 1.8.1-4 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(8)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2026:16252IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:16252 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:16692IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:16692 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:16693IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:16693 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:18040IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:18040 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:18044IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:18044 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:18045IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:18045 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:18046IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:18046 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2026:18048IMPORTANT2026-04-13
RHSA-2026:18048 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 227 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 128 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-17 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 01:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-20 09:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-01 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-24 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-16 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-14 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-13 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-11 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 19:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-11 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-10 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-09 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-08 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-06 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:jq
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:16252 · redhat:RHSA-2026:23233 · redhat:RHSA-2026:25044
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-40164?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-40164 published?
Is CVE-2026-40164 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-40164?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-40164?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-40164
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-40164?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.