decompress before 4.2.2 contains an improper path containment check that enables directory traversal and arbitrary file write. The safeMakeDir function (index.js line 29) and the extraction path validation (index.js line 106) use String.indexOf() to verify the resolved path is within the output directory: realDestinationDir.indexOf(realOutputPath) !== 0. This check is flawed because it does not enforce a path separator boundary. For example, "/tmp/app_config".indexOf("/tmp/app") returns 0, incorrectly passing the check even though /tmp/app_config is outside /tmp/app. Combined with the unvalidated symlink creation in the same package, an attacker can write arbitrary files to directories adjacent to the extraction target. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2020-12265. The correct check requires appending a path separator: realParentPath.indexOf(realOutputPath + path.sep) !== 0.
CVE-2026-39245
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 6.2 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-10. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 6.2; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.2
- EG Score
- 6.2MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity62% × 45%The EG Score, 6.2 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 9, 2026
Last Modified
July 13, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026[CVE-2026-39245] Path traversal via indexOf containment bypass → arbitrary file write (CVE-2020-12265 bypass) · Issue #115 · kevva/decompress · GitHub
https://github.com/kevva/decompress/issues/115GitHub - kevva/decompress: Extracting archives made easy · GitHub
https://github.com/kevva/decompressVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-39245(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | dotnet8-0-main-8.0.128-1.1.hum1 | 2026-07-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 228 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 129 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-01 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 16:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-28 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-23 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 06:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-14 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 08:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-12 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-05 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-30 06:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-27 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-26 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-25 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-24 04:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-23 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-22 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-21 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qcj4-cj8p-fhf4 · GitHub CVSS 6.2
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-20 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
8 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:37577
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-39245?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-39245 published?
Is CVE-2026-39245 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-39245?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-39245?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-39245
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-39245?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.