CVE-2026-35511

HIGHCVSS · not yet scored
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Authorizer: Zero-click account takeover via OAuth identity linking to unverified email accounts

The OAuth callback handler links incoming OAuth identities (Google, GitHub, etc.) to existing accounts matched by email address without verifying that the existing account's email was verified by its original owner. An attacker who pre-registers with a victim's email address (without verifying it) gains persistent password-based access to the victim's account after the victim completes a normal OAuth login. Verified against HEAD (commit 73679fa).

Root Cause

In internal/http_handlers/oauth_callback.go, when an OAuth login occurs for an email that already exists in the database:

Line 125: The existing user is looked up by email:

existingUser, err := h.StorageProvider.GetUserByEmail(ctx, refs.StringValue(user.Email))

Line 164: The OAuth user object is replaced with the existing user:

user = existingUser

Lines 173-176: The OAuth provider is appended to the existing user's signup methods:

signupMethod := existingUser.SignupMethods if !strings.Contains(signupMethod, provider) { signupMethod = signupMethod + "," + provider } user.SignupMethods = signupMethod

Lines 179-181: If the existing account's email was NOT verified, it is automatically verified:

if user.EmailVerifiedAt == nil { now := time.Now().Unix() user.EmailVerifiedAt = &now }

Line 219: The merged user is saved to the database:

user, err = h.StorageProvider.UpdateUser(ctx, user)

At no point is the existing account's password invalidated or the owner notified that a new OAuth identity was linked.

Attack Chain

  • Attacker signs up with [email protected] using email/password. Attacker sets a known password but does NOT click the email verification link. The account exists in the database with EmailVerifiedAt = nil.
  • Some time later, the real owner of [email protected] logs in via Google OAuth (a completely normal action).
  • The OAuth callback at line 125 finds the attacker's existing account by email.
  • At line 164, the Google OAuth identity is linked to the attacker's account.
  • At line 179-181, the email is automatically verified (the attacker never verified it, but now it's marked as verified).
  • At line 175, "google" is appended to the signup methods. The account now has both "basic_auth" and "google" as valid login methods.
  • The attacker's original password is still valid in the database. It was never cleared, changed, or invalidated.
  • The attacker logs in with [email protected] and the password they originally set. They now have full access to the victim's account, including any data the victim added via their Google session.

Why This Is Zero-Click

The victim performs no unusual action. They simply log in via their Google account, which is the expected, secure behavior. The attacker staged the account beforehand and gains access without any further interaction.

This is a classic Account Linking vulnerability (cited in OWASP authentication guidelines). The core logic flaw is a trust boundary violation. Authorizer correctly trusts that Google has verified the email address, but it incorrectly extends that trust to validate the password that was set by the unverified attacker. The attacker maintains persistent, password-based backdoor access to the victim's account, even if the victim later revokes Authorizer's OAuth access from their Google account settings. The password was set before Google was ever involved and is never invalidated by the linking process.

Impact

  • Full account takeover for any user who logs in via OAuth
  • Attacker maintains persistent password-based access even after the victim changes OAuth providers
  • All data the victim creates after OAuth login is accessible to the attacker
  • The victim has no indication their account was pre-staged
  • Affects every OAuth provider configured in Authorizer (Google, GitHub, Facebook, Apple, LinkedIn, Twitter, Discord, Twitch, Roblox, Microsoft)

Suggested Fix

Before linking an OAuth identity to an existing account, verify that the existing account's email is already verified:

existingUser, err := h.StorageProvider.GetUserByEmail(ctx, refs.StringValue(user.Email)) if err == nil { // Account exists. Only link if email is already verified. if existingUser.EmailVerifiedAt == nil { // Email not verified by original owner. Do NOT link. // Either: reject the login, or create a new separate account, // or delete the unverified account and create a fresh one for the OAuth user. } }

Additionally, when linking a new OAuth identity, invalidate any existing password on the account or require the user to re-authenticate via the original method.

Credit

Koda Reef

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 14, 2026

Last Modified

August 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-35511(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/authorizerdev/authorizer—
  • every version up to 0.0.0-20260807033110-66fe488fd2a4: fixed in 0.0.0-20260807033110-66fe488fd2a4
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-12 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-30 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-14 16:25 UTCEG score recompute

Same product

1 shown

Go:github.com/authorizerdev/authorizer

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-35511?
CVE-2026-35511 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 14, 2026. Authorizer: Zero-click account takeover via OAuth identity linking to unverified email accounts The OAuth callback handler links incoming OAuth identities (Google, GitHub, etc.) to existing accounts matched by email address without verifying that the existing account's email was verified by its…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-35511 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-35511 was published on August 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-35511?
A fix for CVE-2026-35511 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-35511 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-35511

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-35511?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.