NanoMQ MQTT Broker (NanoMQ) is an all-around Edge Messaging Platform. In versions 0.24.10 and below, when NanoMQ handles high-concurrency reconnect traffic using a reconnect-collision payload, the broker can crash due to a NULL pointer dereference during MQTT session resumption for clean_start=0 clients. The transport's p_peer callback (tcptran_pipe_peer()) iterates cpipe->subinfol while copying session metadata from the cached old pipe to the new reconnecting pipe, without checking whether the pointer is NULL. Under a reconnect race, cpipe->subinfol can be freed and set to NULL before session restore invokes this function, resulting in a remote unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (process crash) condition. This issue has been fixed in version 0.24.11.
CVE-2026-32134
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 43EG Risk 43/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity59% × 45%The EG Score, 5.9 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 43rd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 19, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated May 20, 2026NanoMQ v0.24.10-14 Session Restore Feature: NULL Pointer Dereference Crash in `tcptran_pipe_peer` · Advisory · nanomq/nanomq · GitHub
https://github.com/nanomq/nanomq/security/advisories/GHSA-q36f-83mh-pcv2NanoMQ v0.24.10-14 Session Restore Feature: NULL Pointer Dereference Crash in `tcptran_pipe_peer` · Issue #2241 · nanomq/nanomq · GitHub
https://github.com/nanomq/nanomq/issues/2241Release NanoMQ 0.24.11 · nanomq/nanomq · GitHub
https://github.com/nanomq/nanomq/releases/tag/0.24.11* MDF [trasnport/mqtt] add more null checker base on review · nanomq/NanoNNG@522ec62 · GitHub
https://github.com/nanomq/NanoNNG/commit/522ec62e29e60d1122f2aedaa6e702dcf089f7bbWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 92 of 192 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 8 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 100 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 03:39 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
Show 67 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 05:53 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-23 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-20 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-14 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-12 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-10 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-09 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-08 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-05 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-03 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-02 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-01 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-26 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-32134?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-32134 published?
Is CVE-2026-32134 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-32134?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-32134?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-32134
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-32134?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.