CVE-2026-31706

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
8.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl()

smb_inherit_dacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation:

aces_base = kmalloc(sizeof(struct smb_ace) * num_aces * 2, ...);

num_aces is a u16 read from le16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl->num_aces) without checking that it is consistent with the declared pdacl_size. An authenticated client whose parent directory's security.NTACL is tampered (e.g. via offline xattr corruption or a concurrent path that bypasses parse_dacl()) can present num_aces = 65535 with minimal actual ACE data. This causes a ~8 MB allocation (not kzalloc, so uninitialized) that the subsequent loop only partially populates, and may also overflow the three-way size_t multiply on 32-bit kernels.

Additionally, the ACE walk loop uses the weaker offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) minimum size check rather than the minimum valid on-wire ACE size, and does not reject ACEs whose declared size is below the minimum.

Reproduced on UML + KASAN + LOCKDEP against the real ksmbd code path. A legitimate mount.cifs client creates a parent directory over SMB (ksmbd writes a valid security.NTACL xattr), then the NTACL blob on the backing filesystem is rewritten to set num_aces = 0xFFFF while keeping the posix_acl_hash bytes intact so ksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()'s hash check still passes. A subsequent SMB2 CREATE of a child under that parent drives smb2_open() into smb_inherit_dacl() (share has "vfs objects = acl_xattr" set), which fails the page allocator:

WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5226 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 ___kmalloc_large_node+0x68/0x130 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x24/0x70 __kmalloc_noprof+0x4c9/0x690 smb_inherit_dacl+0x394/0x2430 smb2_open+0x595d/0xabe0 handle_ksmbd_work+0x3d3/0x1140

With the patch applied the added guard rejects the tampered value with -EINVAL before any large allocation runs, smb2_open() falls back to smb2_create_sd_buffer(), and the child is created with a default SD. No warning, no splat.

Fix by:

  • Validating num_aces against pdacl_size using the same formula
applied in parse_dacl().
  • Replacing the raw kmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2) with
kmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...)) for overflow-safe allocation.
  • Tightening the per-ACE loop guard to require the minimum valid
ACE size (offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) and rejecting under-sized ACEs, matching the hardening in smb_check_perm_dacl() and parse_dacl().

v1 -> v2:

  • Replace the synthetic test-module splat in the changelog with a
real-path UML + KASAN reproduction driven through mount.cifs and SMB2 CREATE; Namjae flagged the kcifs3_test_inherit_dacl_old name in v1 since it does not exist in ksmbd.
  • Drop the commit-hash citation from the code comment per Namjae's
review; keep the parse_dacl() pointer.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EPSS
29.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2026

Last Modified

June 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 3, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59c32abaaec9cdd6164811c7e864e72f7554b82d
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e5360b422dd741cb315654a191fa73869a37414
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e4e2ea2a781018ed5d75f969e3e5606beb66e48
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/063a7409b0de46d7c770b65bb0338e6fdb3b1f0a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31706(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 141 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-14 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-14 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-14 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-14 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-12 06:39 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-06-12 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-11 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-11 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-11 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-11 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-10 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-10 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-10 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-10 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-09 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-09 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-09 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-09 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-08 11:03 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-06-08 11:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-07 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-07 22:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-07 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-06-06 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-06-06 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 07:14 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-06 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-06-05 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-05 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-06-04 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-04 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-06-04 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-06-03 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-03 14:25 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31706?
CVE-2026-31706 is a high vulnerability published on May 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate numaces and harden ACE walk in smbinherit_dacl() smbinheritdacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation: acesbase = kmalloc(sizeof(struct…
When was CVE-2026-31706 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31706 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2026, with the most recent update on June 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31706 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31706 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 29.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31706?
CVE-2026-31706 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31706?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31706, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31706

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31706?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.