CVE-2026-31706

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-01. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl()

smb_inherit_dacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation:

aces_base = kmalloc(sizeof(struct smb_ace) * num_aces * 2, ...);

num_aces is a u16 read from le16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl->num_aces) without checking that it is consistent with the declared pdacl_size. An authenticated client whose parent directory's security.NTACL is tampered (e.g. via offline xattr corruption or a concurrent path that bypasses parse_dacl()) can present num_aces = 65535 with minimal actual ACE data. This causes a ~8 MB allocation (not kzalloc, so uninitialized) that the subsequent loop only partially populates, and may also overflow the three-way size_t multiply on 32-bit kernels.

Additionally, the ACE walk loop uses the weaker offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) minimum size check rather than the minimum valid on-wire ACE size, and does not reject ACEs whose declared size is below the minimum.

Reproduced on UML + KASAN + LOCKDEP against the real ksmbd code path. A legitimate mount.cifs client creates a parent directory over SMB (ksmbd writes a valid security.NTACL xattr), then the NTACL blob on the backing filesystem is rewritten to set num_aces = 0xFFFF while keeping the posix_acl_hash bytes intact so ksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()'s hash check still passes. A subsequent SMB2 CREATE of a child under that parent drives smb2_open() into smb_inherit_dacl() (share has "vfs objects = acl_xattr" set), which fails the page allocator:

WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5226 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 ___kmalloc_large_node+0x68/0x130 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x24/0x70 __kmalloc_noprof+0x4c9/0x690 smb_inherit_dacl+0x394/0x2430 smb2_open+0x595d/0xabe0 handle_ksmbd_work+0x3d3/0x1140

With the patch applied the added guard rejects the tampered value with -EINVAL before any large allocation runs, smb2_open() falls back to smb2_create_sd_buffer(), and the child is created with a default SD. No warning, no splat.

Fix by:

  • Validating num_aces against pdacl_size using the same formula
applied in parse_dacl().
  • Replacing the raw kmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2) with
kmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...)) for overflow-safe allocation.
  • Tightening the per-ACE loop guard to require the minimum valid
ACE size (offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) and rejecting under-sized ACEs, matching the hardening in smb_check_perm_dacl() and parse_dacl().

v1 -> v2:

  • Replace the synthetic test-module splat in the changelog with a
real-path UML + KASAN reproduction driven through mount.cifs and SMB2 CREATE; Namjae flagged the kcifs3_test_inherit_dacl_old name in v1 since it does not exist in ksmbd.
  • Drop the commit-hash citation from the code comment per Namjae's
review; keep the parse_dacl() pointer.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
30%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 3, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59c32abaaec9cdd6164811c7e864e72f7554b82d
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e5360b422dd741cb315654a191fa73869a37414
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e4e2ea2a781018ed5d75f969e3e5606beb66e48
generic

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/063a7409b0de46d7c770b65bb0338e6fdb3b1f0a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31706(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.84osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.1-1~exp1 (129 versions)7.0.3-1

All Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 230 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-04 00:59 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-14 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-10 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-10 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-09 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-09 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-09 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-08 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-08 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-08 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-06 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-06 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-06 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-02 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-02 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31706?
CVE-2026-31706 is a high vulnerability published on May 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate numaces and harden ACE walk in smbinherit_dacl() smbinheritdacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation: acesbase = kmalloc(sizeof(struct…
When was CVE-2026-31706 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31706 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31706 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31706 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 70.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31706?
CVE-2026-31706 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31706?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31706, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31706

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31706?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.