CVE-2026-31588

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-04-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values

When exiting to userspace to service an emulated MMIO write, copy the to-be-written value to a scratch field in the MMIO fragment if the size of the data payload is 8 bytes or less, i.e. can fit in a single chunk, instead of pointing the fragment directly at the source value.

This fixes a class of use-after-free bugs that occur when the emulator initiates a write using an on-stack, local variable as the source, the write splits a page boundary, *and* both pages are MMIO pages. Because KVM's ABI only allows for physically contiguous MMIO requests, accesses that split MMIO pages are separated into two fragments, and are sent to userspace one at a time. When KVM attempts to complete userspace MMIO in response to KVM_RUN after the first fragment, KVM will detect the second fragment and generate a second userspace exit, and reference the on-stack variable.

The issue is most visible if the second KVM_RUN is performed by a separate task, in which case the stack of the initiating task can show up as truly freed data.

================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in complete_emulated_mmio+0x305/0x420 Read of size 1 at addr ffff888009c378d1 by task syz-executor417/984

CPU: 1 PID: 984 Comm: syz-executor417 Not tainted 5.10.0-182.0.0.95.h2627.eulerosv2r13.x86_64 #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 check_memory_region+0xfd/0x1f0 memcpy+0x20/0x60 complete_emulated_mmio+0x305/0x420 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x63f/0x6d0 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x413/0xb20 __se_sys_ioctl+0x111/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x30/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1 RIP: 0033:0x42477d Code: <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007faa8e6890e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004d7338 RCX: 000000000042477d RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000ae80 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00000000004d7330 R08: 00007fff28d546df R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004d733c R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000040a200 R15: 00007fff28d54720

The buggy address belongs to the page: page:0000000029f6a428 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x9c37 flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 000fffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffea0000270dc8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888009c37780: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888009c37800: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff >ffff888009c37880: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff888009c37900: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff888009c37980: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ==================================================================

The bug can also be reproduced with a targeted KVM-Unit-Test by hacking KVM to fill a large on-stack variable in complete_emulated_mmio(), i.e. by overwrite the data value with garbage.

Limit the use of the scratch fields to 8-byte or smaller accesses, and to just writes, as larger accesses and reads are not affected thanks to implementation details in the emulator, but add a sanity check to ensure those details don't change in the future. Specifically, KVM never uses on-stack variables for accesses larger that 8 bytes, e.g. uses an operand in the emulator context, and *al ---truncated---

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated May 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc6a6c3db3a4eca7e747cfc46e22c08d016c68f7
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5a02d37eb0739f462fa12df449ab9b3480c783b
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a7b6d75c8f85b09dea893f64a85a356bcf6c3fe
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b83d91e9ae92fe1258d7040a32430bbb3bb7d6e
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22d2ff69d487a32a8b88f9c970120fc2daa08a77
generic

KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b16e69d17d8c35c5c9d5918bf596c75a44655d3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31588(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.258osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (126 versions)6.19.14-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 244 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-04 03:16 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-17 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-17 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-16 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-14 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-14 04:08 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-14 04:08 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-14 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-13 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-13 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-12 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-11 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-11 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-11 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-11 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-11 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-10 04:37 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-10 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-09 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-09 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-09 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-08 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-08 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-08 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-07 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-07 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-06 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-06 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-06 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-06 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-06 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-06 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-05 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-05 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-05 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-03 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-03 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-03 21:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-03 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-03 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-02 11:22 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-02 11:22 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-02 11:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31588?
CVE-2026-31588 is a high vulnerability published on April 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Use scratch field in MMIO fragment to hold small write values When exiting to userspace to service an emulated MMIO write, copy the to-be-written value to a scratch field in the MMIO fragment if the size of the data…
When was CVE-2026-31588 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31588 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31588 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31588 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31588?
CVE-2026-31588 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31588?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31588, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31588

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31588?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.