CVE-2026-31503

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-04-22. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2

When binding a udp_sock to a local address and port, UDP uses two hashes (udptable->hash and udptable->hash2) for collision detection. The current code switches to "hash2" when hslot->count > 10.

"hash2" is keyed by local address and local port. "hash" is keyed by local port only.

The issue can be shown in the following bind sequence (pseudo code):

bind(fd1, "[fd00::1]:8888") bind(fd2, "[fd00::2]:8888") bind(fd3, "[fd00::3]:8888") bind(fd4, "[fd00::4]:8888") bind(fd5, "[fd00::5]:8888") bind(fd6, "[fd00::6]:8888") bind(fd7, "[fd00::7]:8888") bind(fd8, "[fd00::8]:8888") bind(fd9, "[fd00::9]:8888") bind(fd10, "[fd00::10]:8888")

/* Correctly return -EADDRINUSE because "hash" is used * instead of "hash2". udp_lib_lport_inuse() detects the * conflict. */ bind(fail_fd, "[::]:8888")

/* After one more socket is bound to "[fd00::11]:8888", * hslot->count exceeds 10 and "hash2" is used instead. */ bind(fd11, "[fd00::11]:8888") bind(fail_fd, "[::]:8888") /* succeeds unexpectedly */

The same issue applies to the IPv4 wildcard address "0.0.0.0" and the IPv4-mapped wildcard address "::ffff:0.0.0.0". For example, if there are existing sockets bound to "192.168.1.[1-11]:8888", then binding "0.0.0.0:8888" or "[::ffff:0.0.0.0]:8888" can also miss the conflict when hslot->count > 10.

TCP inet_csk_get_port() already has the correct check in inet_use_bhash2_on_bind(). Rename it to inet_use_hash2_on_bind() and move it to inet_hashtables.h so udp.c can reuse it in this fix.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 22, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 19, 2026
⚠️ Active exploitation confirmed. No patch confirmed yet.
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1bed05a832ae79be5f7a105da56810eaa59a5f1
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e537dd15d0d4ad989d56a1021290f0c674dd8b28
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6ace0dbcbb7fd285738bb87b42b71b01858c952
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2297e38114316b26ae02f2d205c49b5511c5ed55
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18d84c45def3671d5c89fbdd5d4ab8a3217fe4b4
generic

udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a360f7f73a06ac88f18917055fbcc79694252d7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31503(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.1.168osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.164-1~deb11u1 (16 versions)6.1.170-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)6.1.170-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (121 versions)6.19.11-1

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 219 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-02 03:04 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-16 05:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-16 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-12 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-12 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-12 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-11 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-11 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-11 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-10 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-10 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-10 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-09 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-09 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-09 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-07 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-07 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-07 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-06 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-06 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-06 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-05 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-05 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-05 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-03 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-03 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-03 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-02 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-02 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-02 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-19 23:38 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31503?
CVE-2026-31503 is a medium vulnerability published on April 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udp: Fix wildcard bind conflict check when using hash2 When binding a udp_sock to a local address and port, UDP uses two hashes (udptable->hash and udptable->hash2) for collision detection. The current code switches to "hash2" when…
When was CVE-2026-31503 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31503 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 22, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31503 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31503 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31503?
CVE-2026-31503 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31503?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31503, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31503

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31503?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.