CVE-2026-31444

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-22. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock()

smb_grant_oplock() has two issues in the oplock publication sequence:

1) opinfo is linked into ci->m_op_list (via opinfo_add) before add_lease_global_list() is called. If add_lease_global_list() fails (kmalloc returns NULL), the error path frees the opinfo via __free_opinfo() while it is still linked in ci->m_op_list. Concurrent m_op_list readers (opinfo_get_list, or direct iteration in smb_break_all_levII_oplock) dereference the freed node.

2) opinfo->o_fp is assigned after add_lease_global_list() publishes the opinfo on the global lease list. A concurrent find_same_lease_key() can walk the lease list and dereference opinfo->o_fp->f_ci while o_fp is still NULL.

Fix by restructuring the publication sequence to eliminate post-publish failure:

  • Set opinfo->o_fp before any list publication (fixes NULL deref).
  • Preallocate lease_table via alloc_lease_table() before opinfo_add()
so add_lease_global_list() becomes infallible after publication.
  • Keep the original m_op_list publication order (opinfo_add before
lease list) so concurrent opens via same_client_has_lease() and opinfo_get_list() still see the in-flight grant.
  • Use opinfo_put() instead of __free_opinfo() on err_out so that
the RCU-deferred free path is used.

This also requires splitting add_lease_global_list() to take a preallocated lease_table and changing its return type from int to void, since it can no longer fail.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
38%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48623ec358c1c600fa1e38368746f933e0f1a617
generic

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d7e5a918c1d0aad06db0e17677b66fc9a471021
generic

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a5c6f6d6ceefed2d5210ee420fb75f8362461f46
generic

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7de55bba69cbf0f9280daaea385daf08bc076121
generic

ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smb_grant_oplock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e785f004cbc56390479b77375726ea9b0d1a8a6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31444(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.6.131osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (124 versions)6.19.11-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 387 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-02 14:01 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-16 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-16 06:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-16 06:01 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-16 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-15 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-15 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-15 01:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-14 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-14 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-14 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-14 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-14 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-14 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-14 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-14 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-14 04:20 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-14 04:20 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-14 04:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-13 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-13 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-13 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-13 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-12 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-12 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-12 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-12 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-12 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-12 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-12 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-11 20:59 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-11 20:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-11 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-11 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-11 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-11 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-11 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-11 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-11 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-10 09:42 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-10 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-10 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-10 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-10 01:18 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-10 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-09 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-09 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-09 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-09 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-09 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-09 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-09 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-09 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-09 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-09 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-09 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-09 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-08 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-08 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-08 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-08 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-08 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-08 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31444?
CVE-2026-31444 is a critical vulnerability published on April 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free and NULL deref in smbgrantoplock() smbgrantoplock() has two issues in the oplock publication sequence: 1) opinfo is linked into ci->moplist (via opinfo_add) before addleasegloballist() is called. If…
When was CVE-2026-31444 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31444 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 22, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31444 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31444 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31444?
CVE-2026-31444 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31444?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31444, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31444

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31444?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.