CVE-2026-27140

HIGHNVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-04-08. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-20002 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 8, 2026

Last Modified

September 10, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jun 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

GO-2026-4871 - Go Packages

https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4871
Web page

cmd/go: trust layer bypass when using cgo and SWIG · Issue #78335 · golang/go · GitHub

https://go.dev/issue/78335

Patch Availability(17)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17867880122026-08-26redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17867629822026-08-26redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17870593942026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17821849242026-07-09redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17809782722026-06-17redhat
redhatopenshift4/ovirt-csi-driver-rhel9-operator:17800449102026-06-10redhat
redhatgo-toolset:rhel8-8060020260505152018.97d7f71f2026-05-13redhat
redhatgo-toolset:rhel8-8040020260505161557.5081a2622026-05-13redhat
redhatgo-toolset:rhel8-8080020260506150958.6b4b45d82026-05-13redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.17.13-12.el9_02026-05-12redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.19.13-25.el9_22026-05-12redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.21.13-16.el9_42026-05-12redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.25.9-1.el9_62026-05-11redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.25.9-1.el10_02026-05-11redhat
redhatgo-toolset:rhel8-8100020260422204008.a3795dee2026-04-27redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.25.9-1.el9_72026-04-24redhat
redhatgolang-0:1.25.9-3.el10_12026-04-23redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:14(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-1.251.25.0-1 ... 1.25.8-1 (9 versions)
  • every version up to 1.25.9-1: fixed in 1.25.9-1
—
golang-1.261.26.0-1, 1.26.1-1, 1.26~rc2-1, 1.26~rc3-1, 1.26~rc3-2
  • every version up to 1.26.2-1: fixed in 1.26.2-1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-1.151.15.15-1 ... 1.15.9-6 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-1.191.19.10-1 ... 1.19.9-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-1.241.24.12-1 ... 1.24.9-1 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
toolchain—
  • every version up to 1.25.9: fixed in 1.25.9
  • 1.26.0-0 up to 1.26.2: fixed in 1.26.2
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 304 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 207 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-24 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  15. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  19. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  16. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  17. 2026-09-29 19:32 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  21. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  22. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  23. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  26. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  27. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  29. 2026-09-10 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-10 13:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  31. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-10 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  34. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  35. 2026-09-09 12:40 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-09 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-09 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  39. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-07 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-07 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-07 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-07 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  46. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  47. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  52. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  53. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  54. 2026-08-27 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-27 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  56. 2026-08-27 13:03 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-27 13:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-08-26 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-26 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-26 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  62. 2026-08-26 12:23 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-26 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-26 12:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5w89-2c2x-6x66 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  66. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  67. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  68. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  69. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  70. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  71. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  72. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-27140?
CVE-2026-27140 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 8, 2026. SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-27140 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-27140 was published on April 8, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 10, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-27140 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-27140 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-27140?
CVE-2026-27140 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-27140?
A fix for CVE-2026-27140 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-27140 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-27140

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-27140?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.