An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.3, 5.2 before 5.2.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.29.
URLField.to_python() in Django calls urllib.parse.urlsplit(), which performs NFKC normalization on Windows that is disproportionately slow for certain Unicode characters, allowing a remote attacker to cause denial of service via large URL inputs containing these characters.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.
CVE-2026-25673
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(low)
- EPSS
- 50.1%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 3, 2026
Last Modified
June 30, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Jul 6, 20262444115 – (CVE-2026-25673) CVE-2026-25673 django: Django: Denial of Service via slow URL normalization on Windows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2444115Django security releases issued: 6.0.3, 5.2.12, and 4.2.29 | Weblog | Django
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/mar/03/security-releases/Archive of security issues | Django documentation | Django
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 04:31 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-400
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-25673?
When was CVE-2026-25673 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-25673 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-25673?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-25673?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-25673
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-25673?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.