CVE-2026-25527

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 1.0% (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from the CNA's CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS

Also known asEUVD-2026-7968 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9jj8-v89v-xjvw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

changedetection.io is vulnerable to unauthenticated static path traversal

Summary

The /static// route accepts group="..", which causes send_from_directory("static/..", filename) to execute. This moves the base directory up to /app/changedetectionio, enabling unauthenticated local file read of application source files (e.g., flask_app.py). Severity is low information disclosure (C:L).

Details

The vulnerable code is in changedetectionio/flask_app.py inside static_content():

group = re.sub(r'[^\w.-]+', '', group.lower())
filename = re.sub(r'[^\w.-]+', '', filename.lower())
...
return send_from_directory(f"static/{group}", path=filename)

The group sanitization allows dots, so group=".." passes validation. This results in send_from_directory("static/..", filename), effectively shifting the base directory to /app/changedetectionio and allowing reads of files in that directory. The route is unauthenticated, so any user can retrieve source files without logging in.

> Limitation: the route only matches /static// and rejects slashes inside filename, so it cannot traverse further to arbitrary system paths like /etc/passwd. It is limited to files inside the application package directory.

PoC

1) Start an instance (example: Docker on port 5050)
docker run -d --name cdio -p 127.0.0.1:5050:5000 -v cdio-data:/datastore cdio-local

2) Reproduce (URL-encoded traversal)

curl -i http://127.0.0.1:5050/static/%2e%2e/flask_app.py

(curl path passthrough)

curl --path-as-is -i http://127.0.0.1:5050/static/../flask_app.py

3) Observe that the response body contains Python source code from flask_app.py.

Impact

  • Vulnerability type: Directory Traversal / Local File Read
  • Affected users: Anyone with network access (no authentication required)
  • Scope: Source files under /app/changedetectionio
  • Security impact: Internal logic exposure can aid further exploitation (Confidentiality: Low)

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
63rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.the CNA's CVSS · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 20, 2026

Last Modified

July 20, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-25527(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
changedetection-io0.38.2 ... 0.53.1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 0.53.2: fixed in 0.53.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 140 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 41 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 04:30 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  2. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  3. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  4. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  5. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  7. 2026-10-04 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  9. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  10. 2026-10-01 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  12. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  13. 2026-09-28 06:19 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  15. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  16. 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  17. 2026-09-24 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-23 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  20. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  21. 2026-09-18 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 12:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  25. 2026-09-14 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  27. 2026-09-13 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  29. 2026-09-12 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  33. 2026-09-09 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  37. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  38. 2026-09-06 11:30 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-05 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  41. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  45. 2026-08-31 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  50. 2026-08-28 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  52. 2026-08-27 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  54. 2026-08-26 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  56. 2026-08-25 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-23 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  59. 2026-08-21 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  61. 2026-08-20 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  63. 2026-08-19 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  65. 2026-08-18 22:22 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  67. 2026-08-17 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  69. 2026-08-16 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  71. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  72. 2026-08-15 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  74. 2026-08-14 20:19 UTCEG score recompute

Public detection templates

(1 reference)

A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2026/CVE-2026-25527.yaml
    Published Jun 8, 2026

    changedetection.io <= 0.52.9 - Unauthenticated Path Traversal

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-25527?
CVE-2026-25527 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 20, 2026. changedetection.io is vulnerable to unauthenticated static path traversal Summary The /static/<group>/<filename> route accepts group="..", which causes sendfromdirectory("static/..", filename) to execute. This moves the base directory up to /app/changedetectionio, enabling unauthenticated local…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-25527 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-25527 was published on July 20, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-25527 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-25527 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-25527?
CVE-2026-25527 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-25527?
A fix for CVE-2026-25527 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-25527 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-25527

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-25527?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.