CVE-2026-23450

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-03. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock()

Syzkaller reported a panic in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() [1].

smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() is called in the TCP receive path (softirq) via icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock on the clcsock (TCP listening socket). It reads sk_user_data to get the smc_sock pointer. However, when the SMC listen socket is being closed concurrently, smc_close_active() sets clcsock->sk_user_data to NULL under sk_callback_lock, and then the smc_sock itself can be freed via sock_put() in smc_release().

This leads to two issues:

1) NULL pointer dereference: sk_user_data is NULL when accessed. 2) Use-after-free: sk_user_data is read as non-NULL, but the smc_sock is freed before its fields (e.g., queued_smc_hs, ori_af_ops) are accessed.

The race window looks like this (the syzkaller crash [1] triggers via the SYN cookie path: tcp_get_cookie_sock() -> smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(), but the normal tcp_check_req() path has the same race):

CPU A (softirq) CPU B (process ctx)

tcp_v4_rcv() TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV: sk = req->rsk_listener sock_hold(sk) /* No lock on listener */ smc_close_active(): write_lock_bh(cb_lock) sk_user_data = NULL write_unlock_bh(cb_lock) ... smc_clcsock_release() sock_put(smc->sk) x2 -> smc_sock freed! tcp_check_req() smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(): smc = user_data(sk) -> NULL or dangling smc->queued_smc_hs -> crash!

Note that the clcsock and smc_sock are two independent objects with separate refcounts. TCP stack holds a reference on the clcsock, which keeps it alive, but this does NOT prevent the smc_sock from being freed.

Fix this by using RCU and refcount_inc_not_zero() to safely access smc_sock. Since smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() is called in the TCP three-way handshake path, taking read_lock_bh on sk_callback_lock is too heavy and would not survive a SYN flood attack. Using rcu_read_lock() is much more lightweight.

  • Set SOCK_RCU_FREE on the SMC listen socket so that
smc_sock freeing is deferred until after the RCU grace period. This guarantees the memory is still valid when accessed inside rcu_read_lock().
  • Use rcu_read_lock() to protect reading sk_user_data.
  • Use refcount_inc_not_zero(&smc->sk.sk_refcnt) to pin the
smc_sock. If the refcount has already reached zero (close path completed), it returns false and we bail out safely.

Note: smc_hs_congested() has a similar lockless read of sk_user_data without rcu_read_lock(), but it only checks for NULL and accesses the global smc_hs_wq, never dereferencing any smc_sock field, so it is not affected.

Reproducer was verified with mdelay injection and smc_run, the issue no longer occurs with this patch applied.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=827ae2bfb3a3529333e9

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
44%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 3, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Sep 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d5e4538364b9ceb1ac2941a4deb86650afb3538
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fab5ece76fb42a761178dcd0ebcbf578377b0dd
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd7579f0a2c84ba8a7d4f206201b50dc8ddf90c2
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cadf3da46c15523fba90d80c9955f536ee3b4023
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f00fc26c8a06442b225a350fe000c0a11483e6a3
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e4f873879e075bbd4eb1c644d6933303ac5eba4
generic

net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f315277856caeafcd996c2611afc085ca2d53275

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23450(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(25)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.17.0-40.40) @ questing2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-6.17 (6.17.0-1028.28) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-134.134) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1105.103) @ jammy2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1074 (5.15.0-1074.78) @ jammy2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04 (6.17.0-40.40~24.04.1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.17 (6.17.0-1021.21~24.04.1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1062.69) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.17 (6.17.0-1018.18~24.04.1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.71) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.185.166) @ jammy2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.17 (6.17.0-1021.21) @ questing2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04 (6.17.0-1026.26) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1108.114~20.04.1) @ focal2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2049.50) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1032.33) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-edge (5.15.0.1106.112~20.04.1) @ focal2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-134.134.1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1029.30) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-134.134+fips1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.8 (6.8.0-1060.64) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.17.0-1017.19) @ questing2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1058.61.1) @ noble2026-07-26ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 5.15.203osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.164-1~deb11u1 (16 versions)6.1.170-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)6.1.170-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (119 versions)6.19.10-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 280 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-02 11:14 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-16 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-16 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-16 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-14 22:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-14 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-14 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-14 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-14 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-14 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-14 09:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-14 05:43 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-14 05:43 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-14 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-13 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-13 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-13 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-13 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 00:02 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-13 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-12 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-12 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-12 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-12 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-11 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-11 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-11 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-11 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-11 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-11 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-11 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-10 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-10 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-10 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-10 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-10 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-10 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-09 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-09 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-09 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-09 17:03 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-09 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-09 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-09 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-09 05:14 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-09 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-09 05:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-08 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-08 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-08 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-08 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-08 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-08 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-07 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-07 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-07 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-07 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-07 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-07 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-07 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-06 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-06 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-06 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-06 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-06 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-06 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-06 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-06 04:24 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-06 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-06 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-06 00:20 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23450?
CVE-2026-23450 is a critical vulnerability published on April 3, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smctcpsynrecvsock() Syzkaller reported a panic in smctcpsynrecvsock() [1]. smctcpsynrecvsock() is called in the TCP receive path (softirq) via icskafops->synrecvsock on the clcsock (TCP…
When was CVE-2026-23450 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23450 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 3, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23450 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23450 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 55.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23450?
CVE-2026-23450 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23450?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23450, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23450

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23450?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.