CVE-2026-23397

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-03-26. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints

nfnl_osf_add_callback() validates opt_num bounds and string NUL-termination but does not check individual option length fields. A zero-length option causes nf_osf_match_one() to enter the option matching loop even when foptsize sums to zero, which matches packets with no TCP options where ctx->optp is NULL:

Oops: general protection fault KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:nf_osf_match_one (net/netfilter/nfnetlink_osf.c:98) Call Trace: nf_osf_match (net/netfilter/nfnetlink_osf.c:227) xt_osf_match_packet (net/netfilter/xt_osf.c:32) ipt_do_table (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:293) nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:623) ip_local_deliver (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:262) ip_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:573)

Additionally, an MSS option (kind=2) with length < 4 causes out-of-bounds reads when nf_osf_match_one() unconditionally accesses optp[2] and optp[3] for MSS value extraction. While RFC 9293 section 3.2 specifies that the MSS option is always exactly 4 bytes (Kind=2, Length=4), the check uses "< 4" rather than "!= 4" because lengths greater than 4 do not cause memory safety issues -- the buffer is guaranteed to be at least foptsize bytes by the ctx->optsize == foptsize check.

Reject fingerprints where any option has zero length, or where an MSS option has length less than 4, at add time rather than trusting these values in the packet matching hot path.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
36(Track)
EG Risk 36/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 26, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Jul 14, 2026
⚠️ Active exploitation confirmed. No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec8bf0571b142f29dc0b68ae2ac3952f7a464b38
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9cf17b91e733fec725ebcc0b3098bc5ccd505e0
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dbdfaae9609629a9569362e3b8f33d0a20fd783c
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa0574182c46963c3cdb8cde46ec93aca21100d8
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c6aa008b913e808c4f4d3cde36cb1d9bb5967c6
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c11b5c2436a3a5b450612ab160e3a525b28cfb5
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3932620c04c2938c93c0890c225960d3d34ba355
generic

nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/224f4678812e1a7bc8341bcb666773a0aec5ea6f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23397(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.10.253osv
linuxKernel @ 6.1.167osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (53 versions)5.10.257-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.164-1~deb11u1 (16 versions)6.1.170-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)6.1.170-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (119 versions)6.19.10-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 209 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-02 13:57 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-16 10:10 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-16 10:10 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-16 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-14 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-14 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-14 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-12 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-12 20:45 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-12 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-11 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-11 20:51 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-11 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-11 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-11 03:53 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-11 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-10 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-10 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-09 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-09 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-09 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-09 06:01 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-09 06:01 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-09 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-08 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-08 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-08 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-06 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-06 18:48 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-06 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-06 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-06 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-06 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-03 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-03 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-03 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-03 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-03 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-02 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-02 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-02 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-23 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-17 05:24 UTCOSV refresh
  66. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-14 13:19 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  73. 2026-07-14 13:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  74. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23397?
CVE-2026-23397 is a high vulnerability published on March 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfnetlink_osf: validate individual option lengths in fingerprints nfnlosfaddcallback() validates optnum bounds and string NUL-termination but does not check individual option length fields. A zero-length option causes…
When was CVE-2026-23397 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23397 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 26, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23397 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23397 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23397?
CVE-2026-23397 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23397?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23397, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23397

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23397?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.