CVE-2026-23375

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-03-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes

file_thp_enabled() incorrectly allows THP for files on anonymous inodes (e.g. guest_memfd and secretmem). These files are created via alloc_file_pseudo(), which does not call get_write_access() and leaves inode->i_writecount at 0. Combined with S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) being true, they appear as read-only regular files when CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is enabled, making them eligible for THP collapse.

Anonymous inodes can never pass the inode_is_open_for_write() check since their i_writecount is never incremented through the normal VFS open path. The right thing to do is to exclude them from THP eligibility altogether, since CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS was designed for real filesystem files (e.g. shared libraries), not for pseudo-filesystem inodes.

For guest_memfd, this allows khugepaged and MADV_COLLAPSE to create large folios in the page cache via the collapse path, but the guest_memfd fault handler does not support large folios. This triggers WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio)) in kvm_gmem_fault_user_mapping().

For secretmem, collapse_file() tries to copy page contents through the direct map, but secretmem pages are removed from the direct map. This can result in a kernel crash:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88810284d000 RIP: 0010:memcpy_orig+0x16/0x130 Call Trace: collapse_file hpage_collapse_scan_file madvise_collapse

Secretmem is not affected by the crash on upstream as the memory failure recovery handles the failed copy gracefully, but it still triggers confusing false memory failure reports:

Memory failure: 0x106d96f: recovery action for clean unevictable LRU page: Recovered

Check IS_ANON_FILE(inode) in file_thp_enabled() to deny THP for all anonymous inode files.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 25, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6fa05f0dddd387417d0c28281ddb951582514d6
generic

mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd085fe9a8ebfc5d10314c60452db38d2b75e609
generic

mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08de46a75f91a6661bc1ce0a93614f4bc313c581
generic

mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0524ee56af2c9bfbad152a810f1ca95de8ca00d7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-23375(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.18.1.el10_22026-05-28redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.12.78osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (120 versions)6.19.8-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 196 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-02 15:01 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-16 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-16 10:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-14 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-14 06:43 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-14 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-12 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-12 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-12 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-11 04:04 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-11 04:04 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-11 04:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-10 04:52 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-10 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-09 06:15 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-09 06:15 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-09 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-07 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-07 16:34 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-07 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-06 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-06 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-06 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-03 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-03 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-03 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-02 15:37 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-02 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-02 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-23 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-17 07:16 UTCOSV refresh
  62. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23375?
CVE-2026-23375 is a medium vulnerability published on March 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: thp: deny THP for files on anonymous inodes filethpenabled() incorrectly allows THP for files on anonymous inodes (e.g. guest_memfd and secretmem). These files are created via allocfilepseudo(), which does not call…
When was CVE-2026-23375 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23375 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 25, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23375 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23375 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23375?
CVE-2026-23375 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23375?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23375, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23375

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23375?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.